[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Mon Oct 14 20:23:28 PDT 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/16323?compare_to=16320&baseline=15193
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:16

Comparing:
     Run: 16323, Order: 192660, Start Time: 2013-10-15 01:31:53, End Time: 2013-10-15 03:26:36
      To: 16320, Order: 192636, Start Time: 2013-10-14 23:11:53, End Time: 2013-10-15 01:03:51
Baseline: 15193, Order: 190525, Start Time: 2013-09-11 14:56:37, End Time: 2013-09-11 16:46:18

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 13 (23 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 7 (14 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1087 (1070 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/medley/reg_detect/reg_detect: 37.27% (0.1430 => 0.1963, std.dev.: 0.0167)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan/automotive-susan: 39.42% (0.0411 => 0.0573, std.dev.: 0.0000)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trisolv/trisolv: 32.35% (0.1493 => 0.1976, std.dev.: 0.0002)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops: 20.14% (8.0018 => 9.6137, std.dev.: 0.0228)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-CRC32/telecomm-CRC32: 16.45% (1.4881 => 1.7329, std.dev.: 0.0742)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/FloatMM: 5.25% (0.6938 => 0.7302, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl/Equivalencing-dbl: 4.17% (3.5752 => 3.7242, std.dev.: 0.0466)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 3.06% (8.3939 => 8.6509, std.dev.: 0.0305)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/doitgen/doitgen: 2.30% (3.5693 => 3.6513, std.dev.: 0.0268)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 1.96% (3.1590 => 3.2210, std.dev.: 0.0041)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: 1.41% (7.1841 => 7.2852, std.dev.: 0.0189)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-dbl/ControlFlow-dbl: 1.24% (5.9377 => 6.0115, std.dev.: 0.0264)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000: 1.12% (2.6825 => 2.7125, std.dev.: 0.0025)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-5: -35.42% (0.0528 => 0.0341, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random: -23.33% (0.2597 => 0.1991, std.dev.: 0.0101)
  MultiSource/Applications/ALAC/decode/alacconvert-decode: -22.70% (1.5553 => 1.2023, std.dev.: 0.1165)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Towers: -50.96% (0.0418 => 0.0205, std.dev.: 0.0072)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/strcat: -11.00% (0.1664 => 0.1481, std.dev.: 0.0042)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-dbl/CrossingThresholds-dbl: -2.35% (5.9347 => 5.7955, std.dev.: 0.0360)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-flt/ControlFlow-flt: -1.39% (6.0340 => 5.9499, std.dev.: 0.0130)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: -0.95% (0.1371 => 0.1358, std.dev.: 0.0306)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/medley/reg_detect/reg_detect: 41.53% (0.1387 => 0.1963, std.dev.: 0.0167)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: 10.50% (0.5046 => 0.5576, std.dev.: 0.0179)
  MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: 9.91% (16.5902 => 18.2336, std.dev.: 0.5329)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/himenobmtxpa: 9.70% (0.1989 => 0.2182, std.dev.: 0.0026)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan/automotive-susan: 3.13% (1.0952 => 1.1295, std.dev.: 0.0124)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 63.89% (7.6426 => 12.5256, std.dev.: 0.0394)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: 25.04% (1.1431 => 1.4293, std.dev.: 0.0372)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-CRC32/telecomm-CRC32: 16.85% (1.4830 => 1.7329, std.dev.: 0.0742)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/fibo: 10.88% (4.9428 => 5.4804, std.dev.: 0.0128)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000: 9.58% (2.4753 => 2.7125, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies: 6.80% (0.5561 => 0.5939, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr: 6.58% (0.3771 => 0.4019, std.dev.: 0.0093)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trisolv/trisolv: 5.61% (0.1871 => 0.1976, std.dev.: 0.0002)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: 5.24% (4.5744 => 4.8142, std.dev.: 0.0232)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl/Equivalencing-dbl: 4.49% (3.5642 => 3.7242, std.dev.: 0.0466)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 3.28% (89.7126 => 92.6540, std.dev.: 0.0713)
  MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: 2.65% (14.7810 => 15.1732, std.dev.: 0.1247)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/doitgen/doitgen: 2.33% (3.5683 => 3.6513, std.dev.: 0.0268)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 2.03% (3.1569 => 3.2210, std.dev.: 0.0041)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops: 1.80% (9.4433 => 9.6137, std.dev.: 0.0228)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/SmallPT/smallpt: 1.51% (16.7972 => 17.0511, std.dev.: 0.0693)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: 1.36% (8.1346 => 8.2449, std.dev.: 0.0067)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 1.26% (8.5434 => 8.6509, std.dev.: 0.0305)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/casts: -19.55% (0.1483 => 0.1193, std.dev.: 0.0039)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -55.24% (0.5226 => 0.2339, std.dev.: 0.0305)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: -43.10% (1.5790 => 0.8984, std.dev.: 0.0076)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/em3d/em3d: -29.21% (5.0288 => 3.5598, std.dev.: 0.0531)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: -23.46% (57.2347 => 43.8069, std.dev.: 3.4290)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -17.51% (15.9508 => 13.1582, std.dev.: 0.3809)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -13.34% (20.8247 => 18.0466, std.dev.: 0.2533)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -11.48% (50.0284 => 44.2872, std.dev.: 1.1880)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: -10.19% (3.4956 => 3.1395, std.dev.: 0.0195)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -5.57% (3.7437 => 3.5353, std.dev.: 0.0637)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: -2.69% (17.1431 => 16.6812, std.dev.: 0.0564)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-dbl/IndirectAddressing-dbl: -1.80% (5.4473 => 5.3495, std.dev.: 0.0345)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: -1.15% (7.3703 => 7.2852, std.dev.: 0.0189)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-5: -1.14% (2.8061 => 2.7741, std.dev.: 0.0041)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 0.74% (0.1348 => 0.1358, std.dev.: 0.0306)

Report Time: 1.02s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131014/da2a96cc/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list