[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Mon Nov 4 18:27:34 PST 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/16999?compare_to=16995&baseline=15193
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:16

Comparing:
     Run: 16999, Order: 194026, Start Time: 2013-11-05 00:37:20, End Time: 2013-11-05 02:31:07
      To: 16995, Order: 194015, Start Time: 2013-11-04 22:13:42, End Time: 2013-11-05 00:11:08
Baseline: 15193, Order: 190525, Start Time: 2013-09-11 14:56:37, End Time: 2013-09-11 16:46:18

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 5 (25 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 21 (20 on baseline)
Added Tests: 0 (2 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1083 (1062 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 52.55% (0.9327 => 1.4228, std.dev.: 0.0717)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/primes/primes: 7.26% (0.8385 => 0.8994, std.dev.: 0.0120)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 3.84% (1.1162 => 1.1591, std.dev.: 0.0079)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ary3: 2.71% (4.1740 => 4.2873, std.dev.: 0.0095)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash2: 1.42% (3.6895 => 3.7418, std.dev.: 0.0170)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/network-patricia/network-patricia: -47.45% (0.1764 => 0.0927, std.dev.: 0.0235)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/network-dijkstra/network-dijkstra: -46.14% (0.0893 => 0.0481, std.dev.: 0.0049)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog: -43.02% (0.1318 => 0.0751, std.dev.: 0.0052)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/mvt/mvt: -27.48% (0.0997 => 0.0723, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary: -20.34% (0.3264 => 0.2600, std.dev.: 0.0141)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1: -19.44% (0.4049 => 0.3262, std.dev.: 0.0238)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash2: -17.88% (0.5525 => 0.4537, std.dev.: 0.0312)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: -16.90% (1.5280 => 1.2698, std.dev.: 0.0915)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt/gramschmidt: -14.72% (0.1155 => 0.0985, std.dev.: 0.0064)
  MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: -14.03% (1.4142 => 1.2158, std.dev.: 0.0473)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p: -14.01% (2.9789 => 2.5616, std.dev.: 0.0776)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: -12.71% (0.3021 => 0.2637, std.dev.: 0.0105)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: -9.33% (0.9382 => 0.8507, std.dev.: 0.0170)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: -7.15% (0.9031 => 0.8385, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/oopack_v1p8: -6.51% (0.1582 => 0.1479, std.dev.: 0.0023)
  MultiSource/Applications/hbd/hbd: -4.85% (1.7192 => 1.6359, std.dev.: 0.0209)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-dbl/LinearDependence-dbl: -2.78% (1.4020 => 1.3630, std.dev.: 0.0141)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-bitcount/automotive-bitcount: -26.44% (0.1592 => 0.1171, std.dev.: 0.0058)
  MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: -25.15% (1.2062 => 0.9028, std.dev.: 0.0425)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-basicmath/automotive-basicmath: -10.88% (0.5238 => 0.4668, std.dev.: 0.0199)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso: -4.33% (0.6764 => 0.6471, std.dev.: 0.0110)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 1.34% (0.1348 => 0.1366, std.dev.: 0.0392)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 59.67% (0.8911 => 1.4228, std.dev.: 0.0717)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 23.52% (6.0284 => 7.4465, std.dev.: 0.5075)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: 6.15% (0.8014 => 0.8507, std.dev.: 0.0170)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 4.87% (1.2728 => 1.3348, std.dev.: 0.0122)
  MultiSource/Applications/hbd/hbd: 4.22% (1.5696 => 1.6359, std.dev.: 0.0209)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Recurrences-dbl/Recurrences-dbl: 1.99% (1.2086 => 1.2326, std.dev.: 0.0091)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: 1.85% (0.8233 => 0.8385, std.dev.: 0.0045)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: 56.88% (4.4696 => 7.0120, std.dev.: 0.1995)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 46.59% (7.6426 => 11.2030, std.dev.: 0.1547)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: 46.42% (2.8554 => 4.1809, std.dev.: 0.0466)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt: 37.45% (4.2391 => 5.8266, std.dev.: 0.1632)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: 25.22% (1.1431 => 1.4314, std.dev.: 0.0365)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/atax/atax: 14.79% (0.1210 => 0.1389, std.dev.: 0.0050)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/primes/primes: 8.72% (0.8273 => 0.8994, std.dev.: 0.0120)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/syrk/syrk: 7.55% (3.9856 => 4.2867, std.dev.: 0.0606)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies: 6.58% (0.5561 => 0.5927, std.dev.: 0.0073)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 5.25% (1.1013 => 1.1591, std.dev.: 0.0079)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: 3.78% (5.3716 => 5.5745, std.dev.: 0.0578)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 3.15% (89.7126 => 92.5413, std.dev.: 0.1779)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemver/gemver: 3.02% (0.3836 => 0.3952, std.dev.: 0.0015)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/syr2k/syr2k: 2.29% (5.8715 => 6.0061, std.dev.: 0.0213)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash2: 2.11% (3.6646 => 3.7418, std.dev.: 0.0170)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog: 2.10% (1.0477 => 1.0697, std.dev.: 0.0080)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/fib2: 1.57% (3.5966 => 3.6531, std.dev.: 0.0191)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/SmallPT/smallpt: 1.37% (16.7972 => 17.0266, std.dev.: 0.0109)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: -76.57% (57.2347 => 13.4087, std.dev.: 0.0211)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -51.66% (0.5226 => 0.2526, std.dev.: 0.0266)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: -42.75% (1.5790 => 0.9039, std.dev.: 0.0038)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt: -20.80% (4.0181 => 3.1825, std.dev.: 0.0320)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -18.71% (15.9508 => 12.9665, std.dev.: 0.5891)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary3: -14.66% (5.0002 => 4.2671, std.dev.: 0.2399)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -13.99% (20.8247 => 17.9115, std.dev.: 0.2998)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -13.99% (3.7437 => 3.2201, std.dev.: 0.0834)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: -10.32% (3.4956 => 3.1349, std.dev.: 0.0247)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/mason/mason: -9.47% (0.3304 => 0.2991, std.dev.: 0.0003)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ary3: -8.73% (4.6972 => 4.2873, std.dev.: 0.0095)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: -4.26% (2.5938 => 2.4833, std.dev.: 0.0234)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: -4.16% (8.1346 => 7.7965, std.dev.: 0.0250)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-flt/GlobalDataFlow-flt: -3.91% (3.9552 => 3.8005, std.dev.: 0.0592)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: -3.33% (3.7874 => 3.6613, std.dev.: 0.0138)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: -2.95% (17.1431 => 16.6375, std.dev.: 0.1244)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: -2.85% (2.4471 => 2.3774, std.dev.: 0.0207)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-dbl/IndirectAddressing-dbl: -2.75% (5.4473 => 5.2974, std.dev.: 0.0576)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/power/power: -2.70% (1.2170 => 1.1841, std.dev.: 0.0026)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: -1.31% (4.3592 => 4.3023, std.dev.: 0.0029)

Added Tests - Compile Time
--------------------------
  SingleSource/Regression/C/PR10189

Added Tests - Execution Time
----------------------------
  SingleSource/Regression/C/PR10189

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 1.34% (0.1348 => 0.1366, std.dev.: 0.0392)

Report Time: 0.78s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131104/1dc6ef6b/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list