[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Sat Nov 2 19:04:03 PDT 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/16949?compare_to=16945&baseline=15193
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:16

Comparing:
     Run: 16949, Order: 193933, Start Time: 2013-11-02 23:47:06, End Time: 2013-11-03 02:07:33
      To: 16945, Order: 193932, Start Time: 2013-11-02 21:39:28, End Time: 2013-11-02 23:22:18
Baseline: 15193, Order: 190525, Start Time: 2013-09-11 14:56:37, End Time: 2013-09-11 16:46:18

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 11 (24 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 3 (16 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1093 (1067 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: 13.31% (4.2893 => 4.8600, std.dev.: 0.0611)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-flt/IndirectAddressing-flt: 1.13% (1.2798 => 1.2943, std.dev.: 0.0048)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-dbl/LinearDependence-dbl: 1.02% (1.3602 => 1.3741, std.dev.: 0.0013)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: 63.31% (4.5713 => 7.4656, std.dev.: 0.9060)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-dbl/Searching-dbl: 6.94% (6.4015 => 6.8457, std.dev.: 0.1526)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: 2.52% (4.1882 => 4.2939, std.dev.: 0.0019)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: 1.91% (7.6207 => 7.7660, std.dev.: 0.0291)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-dbl/IndirectAddressing-dbl: 1.73% (5.2811 => 5.3725, std.dev.: 0.0292)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 1.41% (8.5191 => 8.6395, std.dev.: 0.0076)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac: 1.13% (2.4647 => 2.4926, std.dev.: 0.0087)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 1.01% (12.2263 => 12.3498, std.dev.: 0.0103)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/seidel-2d/seidel-2d: -2.76% (1.6351 => 1.5899, std.dev.: 0.0101)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-2d/fdtd-2d: -1.96% (4.6118 => 4.5216, std.dev.: 0.0282)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-apml/fdtd-apml: -1.56% (1.3021 => 1.2818, std.dev.: 0.0006)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 1.60% (0.1371 => 0.1393, std.dev.: 0.0087)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: 20.31% (4.0397 => 4.8600, std.dev.: 0.0611)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 5.75% (1.2728 => 1.3460, std.dev.: 0.0177)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt: 2.77% (1.2639 => 1.2989, std.dev.: 0.0126)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-flt/IndirectAddressing-flt: 2.48% (1.2630 => 1.2943, std.dev.: 0.0048)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-flt/LoopRerolling-flt: 2.34% (1.2468 => 1.2760, std.dev.: 0.0097)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-dbl/LinearDependence-dbl: 1.79% (1.3499 => 1.3741, std.dev.: 0.0013)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: 64.15% (4.5479 => 7.4656, std.dev.: 0.9060)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 61.59% (7.6426 => 12.3498, std.dev.: 0.0103)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: 55.55% (4.4696 => 6.9523, std.dev.: 0.2102)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: 50.38% (2.8554 => 4.2939, std.dev.: 0.0019)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt: 43.19% (4.2391 => 6.0699, std.dev.: 0.0708)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: 31.96% (1.1431 => 1.5084, std.dev.: 0.0017)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000: 18.11% (2.4753 => 2.9236, std.dev.: 0.1683)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trmm/trmm: 11.46% (2.9372 => 3.2738, std.dev.: 0.1248)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 9.19% (3.1730 => 3.4647, std.dev.: 0.0328)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-flt/CrossingThresholds-flt: 8.69% (3.5550 => 3.8640, std.dev.: 0.0267)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop: 8.64% (0.1331 => 0.1446, std.dev.: 0.0004)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies: 6.58% (0.5561 => 0.5927, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: 4.68% (14.7810 => 15.4722, std.dev.: 0.1398)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 4.45% (2.8194 => 2.9449, std.dev.: 0.0198)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 3.10% (89.7126 => 92.4958, std.dev.: 0.7944)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 2.04% (3.1569 => 3.2212, std.dev.: 0.0068)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/SmallPT/smallpt: 1.14% (16.7972 => 16.9894, std.dev.: 0.0364)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 1.12% (8.5434 => 8.6395, std.dev.: 0.0076)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/casts: -20.03% (0.1483 => 0.1186, std.dev.: 0.0027)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/lpbench: -10.54% (0.1195 => 0.1069, std.dev.: 0.0023)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: -7.51% (0.2571 => 0.2378, std.dev.: 0.0010)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: -76.52% (57.2347 => 13.4408, std.dev.: 0.0663)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -51.68% (0.5226 => 0.2525, std.dev.: 0.0053)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: -42.64% (1.5790 => 0.9057, std.dev.: 0.0092)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt: -21.48% (4.0181 => 3.1552, std.dev.: 0.1803)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -20.31% (15.9508 => 12.7118, std.dev.: 0.6149)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/moments: -14.94% (0.1285 => 0.1093, std.dev.: 0.0007)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -13.29% (20.8247 => 18.0580, std.dev.: 0.2674)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -11.64% (3.7437 => 3.3080, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: -4.53% (8.1346 => 7.7660, std.dev.: 0.0291)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: -4.23% (2.5938 => 2.4842, std.dev.: 0.0203)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: -3.13% (3.7874 => 3.6690, std.dev.: 0.0069)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: -2.06% (17.1431 => 16.7897, std.dev.: 0.0504)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/matrix: -1.29% (1.7809 => 1.7580, std.dev.: 0.0068)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 3.34% (0.1348 => 0.1393, std.dev.: 0.0087)

Report Time: 0.78s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131102/d9bf348c/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list