[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Sat Nov 2 03:03:21 PDT 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/16925?compare_to=16922&baseline=15193
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:16

Comparing:
     Run: 16925, Order: 193915, Start Time: 2013-11-02 08:10:05, End Time: 2013-11-02 10:06:51
      To: 16922, Order: 193912, Start Time: 2013-11-02 06:01:29, End Time: 2013-11-02 07:48:32
Baseline: 15193, Order: 190525, Start Time: 2013-09-11 14:56:37, End Time: 2013-09-11 16:46:18

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 13 (21 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 1 (18 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1093 (1068 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/pi: 56.58% (1.6671 => 2.6103, std.dev.: 0.0051)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: 4.30% (1.2708 => 1.3255, std.dev.: 0.0128)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-rc4/enc-rc4: 3.40% (1.8125 => 1.8741, std.dev.: 0.0126)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-dbl/IndirectAddressing-dbl: 3.01% (5.2740 => 5.4327, std.dev.: 0.0141)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: 2.84% (17.9174 => 18.4264, std.dev.: 0.1567)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-md5/enc-md5: 2.38% (2.1549 => 2.2062, std.dev.: 0.0034)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac: 2.26% (2.4494 => 2.5047, std.dev.: 0.0200)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-flt/LoopRerolling-flt: 1.98% (6.5865 => 6.7167, std.dev.: 0.0216)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 1.58% (3.1702 => 3.2204, std.dev.: 0.0181)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 1.55% (23.4931 => 23.8577, std.dev.: 0.0254)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: 1.37% (2.4968 => 2.5311, std.dev.: 0.0030)
  MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi: 1.28% (2.6325 => 2.6661, std.dev.: 0.0069)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: 1.24% (2.3848 => 2.4144, std.dev.: 0.0042)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-2d/fdtd-2d: -3.00% (4.5662 => 4.4290, std.dev.: 0.0507)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 0.80% (0.1367 => 0.1378, std.dev.: 0.0185)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-blowfish/security-blowfish: 3.42% (0.3096 => 0.3202, std.dev.: 0.0040)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 61.63% (7.6426 => 12.3530, std.dev.: 0.0706)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/pi: 57.49% (1.6574 => 2.6103, std.dev.: 0.0051)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: 57.10% (4.4696 => 7.0216, std.dev.: 0.1994)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: 46.38% (2.8554 => 4.1796, std.dev.: 0.0458)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt: 38.14% (4.2391 => 5.8560, std.dev.: 0.1200)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: 23.79% (1.1431 => 1.4150, std.dev.: 0.0443)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies: 6.58% (0.5561 => 0.5927, std.dev.: 0.0001)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 6.52% (3.1730 => 3.3798, std.dev.: 0.0508)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: 5.90% (1.2516 => 1.3255, std.dev.: 0.0128)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 5.15% (2.8194 => 2.9645, std.dev.: 0.0126)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/bmm/bmm: 3.68% (2.5368 => 2.6302, std.dev.: 0.0171)
  MultiSource/Applications/aha/aha: 3.64% (3.5731 => 3.7031, std.dev.: 0.0388)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 3.13% (89.7126 => 92.5246, std.dev.: 0.2372)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 2.93% (1.1013 => 1.1336, std.dev.: 0.0119)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-md5/enc-md5: 2.75% (2.1472 => 2.2062, std.dev.: 0.0034)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 2.01% (3.1569 => 3.2204, std.dev.: 0.0181)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/uint64_to_float: 2.00% (1.4528 => 1.4818, std.dev.: 0.0018)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-flt/LoopRerolling-flt: 1.73% (6.6028 => 6.7167, std.dev.: 0.0216)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 1.65% (23.4704 => 23.8577, std.dev.: 0.0254)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog: 1.45% (1.0477 => 1.0629, std.dev.: 0.0035)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/casts: -19.89% (0.1483 => 0.1188, std.dev.: 0.0003)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/lpbench: -9.87% (0.1195 => 0.1077, std.dev.: 0.0012)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -55.26% (0.5226 => 0.2338, std.dev.: 0.0101)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: -42.30% (1.5790 => 0.9111, std.dev.: 0.0008)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt: -18.75% (4.0181 => 3.2648, std.dev.: 0.1318)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: -16.16% (57.2347 => 47.9870, std.dev.: 0.5026)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/moments: -14.94% (0.1285 => 0.1093, std.dev.: 0.0030)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary3: -13.53% (5.0002 => 4.3239, std.dev.: 0.0303)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -11.97% (3.7437 => 3.2955, std.dev.: 0.0704)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -11.52% (20.8247 => 18.4264, std.dev.: 0.1567)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ary3: -9.31% (4.6972 => 4.2601, std.dev.: 0.0122)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset: -5.57% (0.3501 => 0.3306, std.dev.: 0.0051)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-pc1/enc-pc1: -3.36% (1.7652 => 1.7059, std.dev.: 0.0107)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: -2.60% (3.7874 => 3.6888, std.dev.: 0.0147)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: -2.42% (2.5938 => 2.5311, std.dev.: 0.0030)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/nbench/nbench: -2.22% (22.1263 => 21.6356, std.dev.: 0.1390)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: -1.44% (4.3592 => 4.2964, std.dev.: 0.0116)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: -1.34% (2.4471 => 2.4144, std.dev.: 0.0042)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 2.23% (0.1348 => 0.1378, std.dev.: 0.0185)

Report Time: 0.78s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131102/c62132a5/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list