[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

[llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu]

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/11892?compare_to=11887&baseline=11681
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:13

Comparing:
     Run: 11892, Order: 182957, Start Time: 2013-05-30 20:11:27, End Time: 2013-05-30 22:00:24
      To: 11887, Order: 182935, Start Time: 2013-05-30 16:38:12, End Time: 2013-05-30 18:26:30
Baseline: 11681, Order: 182589, Start Time: 2013-05-23 16:35:30, End Time: 2013-05-23 18:25:16

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 7 (13 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 10 (29 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1090 (1065 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-smail/unix-smail: 36.04% (0.6851 => 0.9320, std.dev.: 0.0204)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-tbl/unix-tbl: 30.86% (1.1382 => 1.4894, std.dev.: 0.0851)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast: 29.80% (1.4227 => 1.8466, std.dev.: 0.1058)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-7: 9.26% (1.7439 => 1.9054, std.dev.: 0.0321)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemm/gemm: 5.22% (21.0214 => 22.1185, std.dev.: 0.3494)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/em3d/em3d: 3.62% (4.9915 => 5.1723, std.dev.: 0.0190)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog: 3.53% (1.0553 => 1.0926, std.dev.: 0.0118)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/fsm/fsm: -37.58% (0.0793 => 0.0495, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: -10.02% (1.5967 => 1.4367, std.dev.: 0.0384)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-dbl/Searching-dbl: -6.78% (1.6884 => 1.5740, std.dev.: 0.0418)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-flt/Searching-flt: -5.49% (1.4734 => 1.3925, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-dbl/Symbolics-dbl: -3.88% (1.7203 => 1.6536, std.dev.: 0.0233)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Recurrences-flt/Recurrences-flt: -3.51% (1.4745 => 1.4228, std.dev.: 0.0122)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -5.97% (0.3887 => 0.3655, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p: -2.48% (95.8649 => 93.4902, std.dev.: 0.8961)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt: -1.62% (5.6524 => 5.5610, std.dev.: 0.0094)
  MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: -1.40% (6.9932 => 6.8953, std.dev.: 0.0338)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 0.20% (0.1478 => 0.1481, std.dev.: 0.0016)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-smail/unix-smail: 37.30% (0.6788 => 0.9320, std.dev.: 0.0204)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-tbl/unix-tbl: 33.07% (1.1193 => 1.4894, std.dev.: 0.0851)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast: 29.56% (1.4253 => 1.8466, std.dev.: 0.1058)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: 4.12% (1.6804 => 1.7497, std.dev.: 0.0132)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Recurrences-flt/Recurrences-flt: 2.86% (1.3832 => 1.4228, std.dev.: 0.0122)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-flt/Searching-flt: 1.89% (1.3667 => 1.3925, std.dev.: 0.0032)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast: 36.73% (0.0275 => 0.0376, std.dev.: 0.0022)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Puzzle: 19.86% (0.1455 => 0.1744, std.dev.: 0.0015)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: 18.08% (1.1695 => 1.3809, std.dev.: 0.0070)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-7: 5.93% (1.7987 => 1.9054, std.dev.: 0.0321)
  MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua: 5.61% (28.2496 => 29.8331, std.dev.: 0.5957)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog: 3.36% (1.0571 => 1.0926, std.dev.: 0.0118)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 2.10% (8.3425 => 8.5174, std.dev.: 0.0578)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi: -26.74% (0.2431 => 0.1781, std.dev.: 0.0064)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/whetstone: -13.76% (0.1097 => 0.0946, std.dev.: 0.0028)
  MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: -10.78% (18.9387 => 16.8974, std.dev.: 0.6555)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/alti_isamax: -10.72% (0.2006 => 0.1791, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc: -5.94% (5.9886 => 5.6330, std.dev.: 0.1339)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat: -5.85% (0.2309 => 0.2174, std.dev.: 0.0008)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -5.72% (1.6793 => 1.5833, std.dev.: 0.0280)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst: -5.59% (0.2397 => 0.2263, std.dev.: 0.0011)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ackermann: -4.97% (0.2151 => 0.2044, std.dev.: 0.0041)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash: -3.95% (0.4554 => 0.4374, std.dev.: 0.0028)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary2: -3.76% (0.2951 => 0.2840, std.dev.: 0.0006)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wordfreq: -2.88% (0.3617 => 0.3513, std.dev.: 0.0019)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle: -43.30% (1.2911 => 0.7320, std.dev.: 0.0026)
  MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: -33.67% (1.3499 => 0.8954, std.dev.: 0.1150)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt: -26.34% (4.4050 => 3.2449, std.dev.: 0.0077)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: -19.16% (6.2328 => 5.0386, std.dev.: 0.0708)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -16.02% (25.3677 => 21.3039, std.dev.: 0.4195)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20: -13.09% (10.3398 => 8.9859, std.dev.: 0.0096)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash: -8.69% (0.7941 => 0.7251, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -7.81% (48.3307 => 44.5580, std.dev.: 0.0707)
  MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/SPASS: -7.21% (8.8720 => 8.2325, std.dev.: 0.1823)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: -6.50% (4.6358 => 4.3343, std.dev.: 0.0318)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt: -5.11% (4.5717 => 4.3380, std.dev.: 0.0072)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: -3.73% (9.1099 => 8.7698, std.dev.: 0.0203)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4: -3.43% (0.4988 => 0.4817, std.dev.: 0.0050)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops: -3.21% (10.2170 => 9.8894, std.dev.: 0.0106)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: -2.69% (5.7342 => 5.5798, std.dev.: 0.0268)
  MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: -1.99% (7.0353 => 6.8953, std.dev.: 0.0338)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/hash: -1.74% (5.3656 => 5.2721, std.dev.: 0.0138)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 2.78% (0.1441 => 0.1481, std.dev.: 0.0016)

Report Time: 0.65s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20130530/8ed8398b/attachment.html>