[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1O3-plainclang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

Wed May 29 11:46:36 PDT 2013

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/11848?compare_to=11844&baseline=11681
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:13

Comparing:
     Run: 11848, Order: 182865, Start Time: 2013-05-29 16:58:57, End Time: 2013-05-29 18:47:10
      To: 11844, Order: 182856, Start Time: 2013-05-29 14:48:56, End Time: 2013-05-29 16:36:35
Baseline: 11681, Order: 182589, Start Time: 2013-05-23 16:35:30, End Time: 2013-05-23 18:25:16

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 21 (20 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 4 (30 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1082 (1057 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fbench: 41.04% (0.0748 => 0.1055, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: 10.35% (0.4136 => 0.4564, std.dev.: 0.0047)
  MultiSource/Applications/treecc/treecc: 9.65% (2.4963 => 2.7372, std.dev.: 0.0623)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: 5.59% (16.6753 => 17.6077, std.dev.: 0.3369)
  MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc: 5.38% (5.6225 => 5.9249, std.dev.: 0.0625)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-tbl/unix-tbl: 3.03% (1.1013 => 1.1347, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 2.77% (0.3754 => 0.3858, std.dev.: 0.0010)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/heapsort: 31.14% (3.0553 => 4.0068, std.dev.: 0.3298)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: 23.18% (4.8140 => 5.9300, std.dev.: 0.1009)
  MultiSource/Applications/minisat/minisat: 17.68% (6.2796 => 7.3898, std.dev.: 0.3472)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/alti_expandfft: 10.75% (29.5602 => 32.7370, std.dev.: 0.9627)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/mvt/mvt: 8.49% (0.2768 => 0.3003, std.dev.: 0.0063)
  MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc: 8.10% (0.1692 => 0.1829, std.dev.: 0.0024)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: 6.74% (15.4787 => 16.5226, std.dev.: 0.1950)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/hash: 6.57% (5.2438 => 5.5884, std.dev.: 0.0311)
  MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua: 4.07% (29.2226 => 30.4125, std.dev.: 0.0494)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/em3d/em3d: 3.25% (5.0111 => 5.1739, std.dev.: 0.0268)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/StatementReordering-flt/StatementReordering-flt: 3.08% (3.1937 => 3.2922, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-dbl/Packing-dbl: 2.76% (5.7727 => 5.9323, std.dev.: 0.0282)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-3: 2.51% (2.0515 => 2.1029, std.dev.: 0.0164)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/InductionVariable-flt/InductionVariable-flt: 1.25% (5.6892 => 5.7605, std.dev.: 0.0191)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/datamining/correlation/correlation: -36.22% (0.1350 => 0.0861, std.dev.: 0.0081)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet: -9.92% (39.8722 => 35.9173, std.dev.: 0.9659)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -9.05% (11.5807 => 10.5322, std.dev.: 0.1330)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-flt/Searching-flt: -4.76% (7.3864 => 7.0351, std.dev.: 0.0158)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 7.15% (0.1413 => 0.1514, std.dev.: 0.0093)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fbench: 35.60% (0.0778 => 0.1055, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  MultiSource/Applications/treecc/treecc: 17.79% (2.3237 => 2.7372, std.dev.: 0.0623)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: 10.37% (0.4135 => 0.4564, std.dev.: 0.0047)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: 9.69% (1.9079 => 2.0927, std.dev.: 0.0088)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 8.50% (2.6076 => 2.8293, std.dev.: 0.0198)
  MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod: 8.01% (2.4944 => 2.6941, std.dev.: 0.0574)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: 7.74% (4.1734 => 4.4965, std.dev.: 0.0366)
  MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/SPASS: 5.75% (17.6379 => 18.6529, std.dev.: 0.3436)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-tbl/unix-tbl: 1.38% (1.1193 => 1.1347, std.dev.: 0.0025)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: 27.66% (4.6452 => 5.9300, std.dev.: 0.1009)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2: 11.54% (0.9806 => 1.0938, std.dev.: 0.0318)
  MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc: 9.19% (0.1675 => 0.1829, std.dev.: 0.0024)
  MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua: 7.66% (28.2496 => 30.4125, std.dev.: 0.0494)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/hash: 4.15% (5.3656 => 5.5884, std.dev.: 0.0311)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog: 3.71% (1.0571 => 1.0963, std.dev.: 0.0074)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/StatementReordering-flt/StatementReordering-flt: 2.85% (3.2009 => 3.2922, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-3: 2.70% (2.0477 => 2.1029, std.dev.: 0.0164)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 1.80% (8.3425 => 8.4925, std.dev.: 0.0326)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 1.32% (88.2998 => 89.4618, std.dev.: 0.0929)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 1.14% (11.4990 => 11.6300, std.dev.: 0.0219)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-sha/security-sha: -12.08% (0.1151 => 0.1012, std.dev.: 0.0011)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT/telecomm-fft: -11.91% (0.1646 => 0.1450, std.dev.: 0.0014)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/network-patricia/network-patricia: -11.53% (0.1075 => 0.0951, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame: -9.32% (5.1587 => 4.6777, std.dev.: 0.1085)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac: -8.54% (1.0314 => 0.9433, std.dev.: 0.0075)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/security-rijndael: -7.06% (0.7381 => 0.6860, std.dev.: 0.0052)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset: -6.72% (15.9860 => 14.9113, std.dev.: 0.1330)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-stringsearch/office-stringsearch: -6.36% (0.1886 => 0.1766, std.dev.: 0.0014)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell: -5.23% (2.0439 => 1.9371, std.dev.: 0.0213)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle: -43.18% (1.2911 => 0.7336, std.dev.: 0.0207)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt: -26.53% (4.4050 => 3.2362, std.dev.: 0.1083)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: -18.90% (6.2328 => 5.0548, std.dev.: 0.0082)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -16.24% (25.3677 => 21.2487, std.dev.: 0.1299)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20: -12.94% (10.3398 => 9.0015, std.dev.: 0.0186)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -11.24% (3.5327 => 3.1356, std.dev.: 0.0454)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark: -9.69% (10.2418 => 9.2492, std.dev.: 0.2678)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -8.20% (48.3307 => 44.3652, std.dev.: 0.0634)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pcompress2/pcompress2: -7.20% (0.1945 => 0.1805, std.dev.: 0.0038)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt: -6.73% (4.5717 => 4.2641, std.dev.: 0.0341)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm: -4.57% (0.2777 => 0.2650, std.dev.: 0.0002)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: -3.30% (4.6358 => 4.4826, std.dev.: 0.0568)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset: -3.19% (0.3702 => 0.3584, std.dev.: 0.0042)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops: -3.06% (10.2170 => 9.9039, std.dev.: 0.0089)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -2.85% (0.3513 => 0.3413, std.dev.: 0.0012)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: -2.79% (5.7342 => 5.5745, std.dev.: 0.0469)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/beamformer/beamformer: -2.74% (1.6679 => 1.6222, std.dev.: 0.0087)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/datamining/correlation/correlation: -2.13% (2.8537 => 2.7929, std.dev.: 0.0224)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/NPB-serial/is/is: -1.35% (12.1841 => 12.0199, std.dev.: 0.0532)
  MultiSource/Applications/aha/aha: -1.26% (3.6251 => 3.5796, std.dev.: 0.0091)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac: -1.20% (2.5408 => 2.5103, std.dev.: 0.0088)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 5.07% (0.1441 => 0.1514, std.dev.: 0.0093)

Report Time: 1.38s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20130529/cde98a50/attachment.html>

[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1O3-plainclang_DEV__powerpc64 test results