[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Thu Jul 25 06:27:11 PDT 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/13748?compare_to=13745&baseline=13681
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:15

Comparing:
     Run: 13748, Order: 187117, Start Time: 2013-07-25 11:41:58, End Time: 2013-07-25 13:28:48
      To: 13745, Order: 187111, Start Time: 2013-07-25 09:32:45, End Time: 2013-07-25 11:20:35
Baseline: 13681, Order: 186967, Start Time: 2013-07-23 18:12:31, End Time: 2013-07-23 20:01:57

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 5 (3 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 9 (39 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1093 (1065 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog: 4.75% (1.0552 => 1.1053, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: 2.89% (4.2640 => 4.3874, std.dev.: 0.0417)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: 2.89% (3.4013 => 3.4997, std.dev.: 0.0120)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 1.75% (11.3604 => 11.5589, std.dev.: 0.0519)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 1.51% (4.4120 => 4.4788, std.dev.: 0.0045)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo: -2.43% (0.7292 => 0.7115, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/plot2fig: -2.21% (0.5918 => 0.5787, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-smail/unix-smail: -1.75% (0.6873 => 0.6753, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/simulator/simulator: -1.32% (0.9066 => 0.8946, std.dev.: 0.0047)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-tbl/unix-tbl: -1.12% (1.1414 => 1.1286, std.dev.: 0.0034)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/primes/primes: -4.44% (0.8707 => 0.8320, std.dev.: 0.0150)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/life/life: -3.03% (2.6113 => 2.5323, std.dev.: 0.0124)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-dbl/IndirectAddressing-dbl: -1.53% (5.2249 => 5.1449, std.dev.: 0.0296)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: -1.04% (1.1959 => 1.1835, std.dev.: 0.0023)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 0.83% (0.1322 => 0.1333, std.dev.: 0.0306)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-CRC32/telecomm-CRC32: 25.95% (1.5030 => 1.8930, std.dev.: 0.0022)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: 6.62% (48.3256 => 51.5263, std.dev.: 0.3037)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/recursive: 1.34% (2.3894 => 2.4215, std.dev.: 0.0067)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/power/power: -36.75% (0.2237 => 0.1415, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bisort/bisort: -33.21% (0.1072 => 0.0716, std.dev.: 0.0014)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/treeadd/treeadd: -25.48% (0.0675 => 0.0503, std.dev.: 0.0008)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/tsp/tsp: -25.03% (0.1818 => 0.1363, std.dev.: 0.0014)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/perimeter/perimeter: -24.24% (0.1114 => 0.0844, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs: -22.13% (6.0938 => 4.7452, std.dev.: 0.0152)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/health/health: -21.02% (0.1993 => 0.1574, std.dev.: 0.0016)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/voronoi/voronoi: -19.74% (0.3576 => 0.2870, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi: -18.41% (1.4685 => 1.1982, std.dev.: 0.0081)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: -13.39% (0.4809 => 0.4165, std.dev.: 0.0150)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/em3d/em3d: -13.31% (0.2367 => 0.2052, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: -9.30% (0.1947 => 0.1766, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc: -7.61% (21.0770 => 19.4732, std.dev.: 0.4351)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ft/ft: -6.29% (0.2432 => 0.2279, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso: -6.13% (6.1631 => 5.7850, std.dev.: 0.0675)
  MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc: -5.56% (6.1121 => 5.7725, std.dev.: 0.1297)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: -4.12% (1.3780 => 1.3212, std.dev.: 0.0087)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/nbench/nbench: -3.45% (1.3677 => 1.3205, std.dev.: 0.0110)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet: -3.14% (37.4863 => 36.3109, std.dev.: 0.3691)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc: -2.02% (10.3031 => 10.0950, std.dev.: 0.0084)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/mpeg2/mpeg2dec/mpeg2decode: -1.52% (1.6686 => 1.6433, std.dev.: 0.0075)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep: -1.42% (1.5544 => 1.5323, std.dev.: 0.0066)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst: -36.18% (0.2134 => 0.1362, std.dev.: 0.0074)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/security-rijndael: -33.21% (0.0816 => 0.0545, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast: -30.72% (0.0345 => 0.0239, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs: -30.03% (0.1189 => 0.0832, std.dev.: 0.0005)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ft/ft: -29.98% (1.0962 => 0.7676, std.dev.: 0.0466)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bisort/bisort: -29.53% (0.9545 => 0.6726, std.dev.: 0.0265)
  MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/ldecod: -25.03% (0.0859 => 0.0644, std.dev.: 0.0021)
  MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi: -13.80% (2.6081 => 2.2483, std.dev.: 0.0048)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/perimeter/perimeter: -11.86% (0.3557 => 0.3135, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/primes/primes: -6.81% (0.8928 => 0.8320, std.dev.: 0.0150)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/tsp/tsp: -6.67% (1.5339 => 1.4316, std.dev.: 0.0260)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/health/health: -6.47% (0.3556 => 0.3326, std.dev.: 0.0071)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bh/bh: -3.78% (2.4879 => 2.3939, std.dev.: 0.0205)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/treeadd/treeadd: -3.68% (0.3773 => 0.3634, std.dev.: 0.0020)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: -3.30% (1.2557 => 1.2143, std.dev.: 0.0077)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -2.22% (3.5791 => 3.4997, std.dev.: 0.0120)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: -1.47% (1.2012 => 1.1835, std.dev.: 0.0023)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: -3.27% (0.1378 => 0.1333, std.dev.: 0.0306)

Report Time: 0.65s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20130725/10f29e2b/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list