[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

[llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu]

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/13723?compare_to=13719&baseline=13681
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:15

Comparing:
     Run: 13723, Order: 187068, Start Time: 2013-07-24 20:36:13, End Time: 2013-07-24 22:25:01
      To: 13719, Order: 187056, Start Time: 2013-07-24 18:22:16, End Time: 2013-07-24 20:13:50
Baseline: 13681, Order: 186967, Start Time: 2013-07-23 18:12:31, End Time: 2013-07-23 20:01:57

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 3 (8 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 38 (11 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1066 (1088 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary: 22.55% (0.0612 => 0.0750, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/nbench/nbench: 12.83% (20.9993 => 23.6933, std.dev.: 0.2988)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/alti_expandfft: 7.45% (31.8441 => 34.2164, std.dev.: 0.4954)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2004-11-28-GlobalBoolLayout: -38.04% (0.0347 => 0.0215, std.dev.: 0.0014)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ackermann: -37.37% (0.0372 => 0.0233, std.dev.: 0.0014)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel: -34.63% (0.0748 => 0.0489, std.dev.: 0.0004)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ary3: -34.10% (0.0563 => 0.0371, std.dev.: 0.0009)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Towers: -33.55% (0.0784 => 0.0521, std.dev.: 0.0014)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640: -33.14% (0.0347 => 0.0232, std.dev.: 0.0021)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Perm: -27.62% (0.0496 => 0.0359, std.dev.: 0.0024)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: -26.04% (1.2843 => 0.9499, std.dev.: 0.0982)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/hash: -25.18% (0.0830 => 0.0621, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-5: -25.17% (0.0445 => 0.0333, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-4: -24.83% (0.0431 => 0.0324, std.dev.: 0.0001)
  MultiSource/Applications/treecc/treecc: -23.87% (3.0869 => 2.3502, std.dev.: 0.0269)
  MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/SPASS: -14.52% (19.9823 => 17.0813, std.dev.: 0.2431)
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: -14.29% (20.1057 => 17.2334, std.dev.: 0.9330)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/chomp: -13.40% (0.2194 => 0.1900, std.dev.: 0.0062)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random: -11.00% (0.2546 => 0.2266, std.dev.: 0.0066)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: -7.31% (6.9778 => 6.4680, std.dev.: 0.1338)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: -5.96% (1.4981 => 1.4088, std.dev.: 0.0309)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sieve: -5.82% (0.3402 => 0.3204, std.dev.: 0.0052)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft: -4.29% (0.2375 => 0.2273, std.dev.: 0.0016)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Towers: -48.42% (0.0380 => 0.0196, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Quicksort: -30.64% (0.0359 => 0.0249, std.dev.: 0.0027)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/heapsort: -29.80% (4.4540 => 3.1268, std.dev.: 0.2423)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/heapsort: -28.39% (4.5009 => 3.2233, std.dev.: 0.4851)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Treesort: -23.90% (0.0883 => 0.0672, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/SPASS: -16.01% (9.5505 => 8.0213, std.dev.: 0.3810)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/strcat: -13.34% (0.1814 => 0.1572, std.dev.: 0.0002)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/chomp: -9.40% (1.1208 => 1.0155, std.dev.: 0.0335)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/lowercase: -7.44% (0.8409 => 0.7783, std.dev.: 0.0098)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: -5.64% (3.0682 => 2.8953, std.dev.: 0.0530)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/himenobmtxpa: -4.23% (4.2657 => 4.0851, std.dev.: 0.0655)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2: -3.79% (0.8708 => 0.8378, std.dev.: 0.0120)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/jacobi-2d-imper/jacobi-2d-imper: -2.75% (1.6203 => 1.5758, std.dev.: 0.0082)
  MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod: -2.17% (3.4269 => 3.3525, std.dev.: 0.0269)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/spectral-norm: -1.52% (2.4331 => 2.3961, std.dev.: 0.0114)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/StatementReordering-flt/StatementReordering-flt: -1.31% (3.3858 => 3.3416, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel: -1.07% (1.2188 => 1.2058, std.dev.: 0.0015)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-flt/CrossingThresholds-flt: -1.01% (3.8213 => 3.7826, std.dev.: 0.0032)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: -16.56% (0.1588 => 0.1325, std.dev.: 0.0013)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-CRC32/telecomm-CRC32: 25.52% (1.5030 => 1.8865, std.dev.: 0.0190)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary: 17.19% (0.0640 => 0.0750, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/alti_expandfft: 14.77% (29.8131 => 34.2164, std.dev.: 0.4954)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/spectral-norm: 13.98% (2.1022 => 2.3961, std.dev.: 0.0114)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/12-IOtest/iotest: 8.08% (0.4246 => 0.4589, std.dev.: 0.0064)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/nbench/nbench: 7.66% (22.0083 => 23.6933, std.dev.: 0.2988)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: 6.60% (48.3256 => 51.5159, std.dev.: 0.2474)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ffbench: 1.99% (1.3679 => 1.3951, std.dev.: 0.0102)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/power/power: -36.88% (0.2237 => 0.1412, std.dev.: 0.0171)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bisort/bisort: -32.37% (0.1072 => 0.0725, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc: -24.15% (0.0439 => 0.0333, std.dev.: 0.0018)
  MultiSource/Applications/ALAC/decode/alacconvert-decode: -19.98% (1.5228 => 1.2186, std.dev.: 0.1117)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: -12.38% (0.9461 => 0.8290, std.dev.: 0.0329)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/InductionVariable-dbl/InductionVariable-dbl: -6.89% (1.5345 => 1.4288, std.dev.: 0.0302)
  MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/SPASS: -4.63% (17.9111 => 17.0813, std.dev.: 0.2431)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/ldecod: -28.17% (0.0859 => 0.0617, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/SPASS: -13.02% (9.2220 => 8.0213, std.dev.: 0.3810)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-basicmath/automotive-basicmath: -5.01% (0.5173 => 0.4914, std.dev.: 0.0014)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: -1.18% (1.2012 => 1.1870, std.dev.: 0.0032)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: -3.85% (0.1378 => 0.1325, std.dev.: 0.0013)

Report Time: 1.16s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20130724/0f0aca2a/attachment.html>