[llvm-testresults] pollyperf4__pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results

[llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu]

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/19222?compare_to=19201&baseline=18565
Nickname: pollyperf4__pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64:24

Comparing:
     Run: 19222, Order: 198137, Start Time: 2013-12-29 00:10:32, End Time: 2013-12-29 04:56:33
      To: 19201, Order: 198117, Start Time: 2013-12-28 19:06:41, End Time: 2013-12-28 23:53:10
Baseline: 18565, Order: 197552, Start Time: 2013-12-18 08:27:56, End Time: 2013-12-18 13:39:39

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 12 (29 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 1 (4 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1097 (1077 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Regression/C++/2008-01-29-ParamAliasesReturn: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0026)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack: 50.00% (0.0320 => 0.0480, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-2: 50.00% (0.0240 => 0.0360, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/mason/mason: 20.00% (0.0600 => 0.0720, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/health/health: 12.50% (0.1600 => 0.1800, std.dev.: 0.0047)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1: 8.33% (0.2400 => 0.2600, std.dev.: 0.0073)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1: 5.95% (0.3360 => 0.3560, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary: 5.71% (0.2800 => 0.2960, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: 3.70% (0.4320 => 0.4480, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt: 2.40% (1.1681 => 1.1961, std.dev.: 0.0105)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones/fhourstones: 2.55% (1.0961 => 1.1241, std.dev.: 0.0096)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/chomp: 1.50% (1.0681 => 1.0841, std.dev.: 0.0059)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame: -4.69% (0.2560 => 0.2440, std.dev.: 0.0044)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/fib2: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/TestLoop: 100.00% (0.0120 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0020)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-2: 50.00% (0.0240 => 0.0360, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/bicg/bicg: 33.33% (0.0600 => 0.0800, std.dev.: 0.0060)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-rc4/enc-rc4: 30.00% (0.0400 => 0.0520, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/adpcm/rawdaudio/rawdaudio: 30.00% (0.0400 => 0.0520, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary: 7.25% (0.2760 => 0.2960, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/constpool: 6.04% (10.3966 => 11.0247, std.dev.: 0.1451)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/office/office: 4.92% (0.2440 => 0.2560, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: 2.39% (1.1721 => 1.2001, std.dev.: 0.0062)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt: 2.32% (1.2081 => 1.2361, std.dev.: 0.0100)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/nbench/nbench: 2.26% (1.2400 => 1.2680, std.dev.: 0.0080)
  MultiSource/Applications/d/make_dparser: 1.80% (3.7800 => 3.8481, std.dev.: 0.0153)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt: 1.70% (1.1761 => 1.1961, std.dev.: 0.0069)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 1.58% (2.7802 => 2.8242, std.dev.: 0.0106)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame: 1.57% (4.8440 => 4.9200, std.dev.: 0.0285)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 1.54% (5.7044 => 5.7924, std.dev.: 0.0142)
  MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc: 1.54% (5.7284 => 5.8164, std.dev.: 0.0163)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc: 1.46% (10.6760 => 10.8320, std.dev.: 0.0423)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-flt/CrossingThresholds-flt: 1.34% (1.1921 => 1.2081, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset: 1.33% (15.0802 => 15.2802, std.dev.: 0.0434)
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 1.25% (17.3242 => 17.5402, std.dev.: 0.0567)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4: 1.08% (27.7977 => 28.0978, std.dev.: 0.0534)
  MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/SPASS: 1.01% (17.4444 => 17.6204, std.dev.: 0.0502)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu: 5.97% (5.0923 => 5.3963, std.dev.: 0.0941)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 4.73% (0.5920 => 0.6200, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones/fhourstones: 3.69% (1.0841 => 1.1241, std.dev.: 0.0096)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: 2.33% (0.5160 => 0.5280, std.dev.: 0.0012)
  MultiSource/Applications/minisat/minisat: 1.15% (6.5964 => 6.6724, std.dev.: 0.0171)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/2mm/2mm: -63.42% (90.4297 => 33.0781, std.dev.: 21.2630)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemm/gemm: -62.73% (46.3269 => 17.2651, std.dev.: 10.1872)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: -26.28% (3.2122 => 2.3681, std.dev.: 0.1097)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm/symm: -23.54% (37.8384 => 28.9298, std.dev.: 0.5542)

Report Time: 2.05s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131228/b8f39115/attachment.html>