[llvm-testresults] pollyperf4__pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results

[llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu]

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/18973?compare_to=18960&baseline=18565
Nickname: pollyperf4__pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64:24

Comparing:
     Run: 18973, Order: 197986, Start Time: 2013-12-24 19:04:35, End Time: 2013-12-24 23:52:30
      To: 18960, Order: 197980, Start Time: 2013-12-24 13:59:39, End Time: 2013-12-24 18:47:28
Baseline: 18565, Order: 197552, Start Time: 2013-12-18 08:27:56, End Time: 2013-12-18 13:39:39

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 15 (18 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 0 (5 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1095 (1087 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-01-04-KNR-Args: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0041)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/pi: 100.00% (0.0120 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  SingleSource/Regression/C++/short_circuit_dtor: 100.00% (0.0120 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs: 60.00% (0.0200 => 0.0320, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uuencode/uuencode: 30.00% (0.0400 => 0.0520, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Queens: 30.00% (0.0400 => 0.0520, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/lu/lu: 26.67% (0.0600 => 0.0760, std.dev.: 0.0051)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr: 20.00% (0.0600 => 0.0720, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: 16.00% (0.1000 => 0.1160, std.dev.: 0.0060)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary2: 5.71% (0.2800 => 0.2960, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: 4.65% (0.5160 => 0.5400, std.dev.: 0.0080)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/constpool: 2.62% (10.6687 => 10.9487, std.dev.: 0.0875)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: 1.74% (1.6121 => 1.6401, std.dev.: 0.0065)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/09-vor/vor: 20.00% (0.0800 => 0.0960, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: 1.15% (2.4282 => 2.4562, std.dev.: 0.0032)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-01-04-KNR-Args: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0041)
  SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/throw_rethrow_test: 133.33% (0.0120 => 0.0280, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/simple: 100.00% (0.0120 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0027)
  SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ConditionalExpr: 75.00% (0.0160 => 0.0280, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/random: 42.86% (0.0280 => 0.0400, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/bicg/bicg: 33.33% (0.0600 => 0.0800, std.dev.: 0.0062)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/analyzer/analyzer: 10.77% (0.2600 => 0.2880, std.dev.: 0.0095)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-blowfish/security-blowfish: 10.67% (0.3000 => 0.3320, std.dev.: 0.0091)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bh/bh: 8.97% (0.3120 => 0.3400, std.dev.: 0.0093)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/constpool: 5.31% (10.3966 => 10.9487, std.dev.: 0.0875)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/18-imp/imp: 5.00% (0.4000 => 0.4200, std.dev.: 0.0072)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/security-rijndael: 4.24% (0.6600 => 0.6880, std.dev.: 0.0067)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: 3.13% (0.5120 => 0.5280, std.dev.: 0.0051)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 2.81% (1.7080 => 1.7560, std.dev.: 0.0131)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt: 2.12% (1.1321 => 1.1561, std.dev.: 0.0092)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: 1.23% (1.6201 => 1.6401, std.dev.: 0.0065)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 1.01% (2.7802 => 2.8082, std.dev.: 0.0095)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm: 6.52% (0.1840 => 0.1960, std.dev.: 0.0024)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/2mm/2mm: -63.61% (90.4297 => 32.9061, std.dev.: 20.0020)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemm/gemm: -62.69% (46.3269 => 17.2851, std.dev.: 9.9539)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/3mm/3mm: -60.69% (125.5798 => 49.3671, std.dev.: 28.7593)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: -26.28% (3.2122 => 2.3681, std.dev.: 0.0979)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm/symm: -23.22% (37.8384 => 29.0538, std.dev.: 0.7131)

Report Time: 1.80s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131224/c92be6a5/attachment.html>