[llvm-testresults] pollyperf5__pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Tue Dec 24 00:44:03 PST 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/18931?compare_to=18922&baseline=18572
Nickname: pollyperf5__pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64:29

Comparing:
     Run: 18931, Order: 197930, Start Time: 2013-12-24 03:57:27, End Time: 2013-12-24 08:48:26
      To: 18922, Order: 197922, Start Time: 2013-12-23 22:50:15, End Time: 2013-12-24 03:40:21
Baseline: 18572, Order: 197554, Start Time: 2013-12-18 09:58:50, End Time: 2013-12-18 15:09:11

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 20 (19 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 0 (8 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1090 (1083 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-26-Shorts: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0041)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2004-11-28-GlobalBoolLayout: 75.00% (0.0160 => 0.0280, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/heapsort: 44.44% (0.0360 => 0.0520, std.dev.: 0.0047)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/8b10b/8b10b: 37.50% (0.0640 => 0.0880, std.dev.: 0.0075)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/beamformer/beamformer: 11.11% (0.1440 => 0.1600, std.dev.: 0.0047)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst: 8.77% (0.2280 => 0.2480, std.dev.: 0.0067)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop: 5.56% (0.2160 => 0.2280, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-smail/unix-smail: 4.09% (0.6840 => 0.7120, std.dev.: 0.0097)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ: 3.45% (0.3480 => 0.3600, std.dev.: 0.0041)
  MultiSource/Applications/treecc/treecc: 2.00% (2.3960 => 2.4440, std.dev.: 0.0129)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-dbl/IndirectAddressing-dbl: 1.71% (1.1681 => 1.1881, std.dev.: 0.0068)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-dbl/Reductions-dbl: 1.60% (1.2481 => 1.2681, std.dev.: 0.0077)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt: 1.40% (1.1401 => 1.1561, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: 1.34% (2.0961 => 2.1241, std.dev.: 0.0073)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 1.29% (2.7882 => 2.8242, std.dev.: 0.0107)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 1.13% (5.6684 => 5.7324, std.dev.: 0.0233)
  MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc: 1.03% (18.6410 => 18.8330, std.dev.: 0.0419)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/durbin/durbin: 9.35% (0.4280 => 0.4680, std.dev.: 0.0147)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/power/power: 1.52% (1.3201 => 1.3401, std.dev.: 0.0035)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/seidel-2d/seidel-2d: 28.57% (0.0560 => 0.0720, std.dev.: 0.0053)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT/telecomm-fft: 16.67% (0.1440 => 0.1680, std.dev.: 0.0078)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: 16.67% (0.0720 => 0.0840, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi: 15.91% (0.1760 => 0.2040, std.dev.: 0.0107)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: 15.38% (0.1040 => 0.1200, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash: 7.55% (0.4240 => 0.4560, std.dev.: 0.0080)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary: 7.35% (0.2720 => 0.2920, std.dev.: 0.0074)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: 7.14% (0.3920 => 0.4200, std.dev.: 0.0091)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-smail/unix-smail: 4.09% (0.6840 => 0.7120, std.dev.: 0.0097)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: 3.90% (0.3080 => 0.3200, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua: 1.87% (4.4800 => 4.5640, std.dev.: 0.0231)
  MultiSource/Applications/d/make_dparser: 1.82% (3.7401 => 3.8081, std.dev.: 0.0161)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt: 1.76% (1.1361 => 1.1561, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-dbl/ControlLoops-dbl: 1.63% (1.2241 => 1.2441, std.dev.: 0.0074)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: 1.53% (2.0921 => 2.1241, std.dev.: 0.0073)
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 1.42% (17.2362 => 17.4802, std.dev.: 0.0453)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark: 1.35% (47.8409 => 48.4889, std.dev.: 0.0849)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 1.29% (2.7882 => 2.8242, std.dev.: 0.0107)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000: 1.32% (3.9562 => 4.0083, std.dev.: 0.0086)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemm/gemm: -62.74% (46.6069 => 17.3651, std.dev.: 8.9130)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/3mm/3mm: -61.86% (130.3441 => 49.7071, std.dev.: 26.2053)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/2mm/2mm: -61.75% (87.0734 => 33.3021, std.dev.: 17.5842)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: -22.45% (3.1002 => 2.4042, std.dev.: 0.0872)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm/symm: -21.07% (37.0343 => 29.2298, std.dev.: 0.7405)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-CRC32/telecomm-CRC32: -6.25% (0.2560 => 0.2400, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ary3: -1.24% (3.5562 => 3.5122, std.dev.: 0.0158)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/himenobmtxpa: -1.02% (1.1721 => 1.1601, std.dev.: 0.0045)

Report Time: 1.89s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131224/cf069cce/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list