[llvm-testresults] pollyperf4__pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Mon Dec 23 11:55:44 PST 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/18895?compare_to=18872&baseline=18565
Nickname: pollyperf4__pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64:24

Comparing:
     Run: 18895, Order: 197908, Start Time: 2013-12-23 15:09:56, End Time: 2013-12-23 20:00:07
      To: 18872, Order: 197903, Start Time: 2013-12-23 09:19:24, End Time: 2013-12-23 14:09:16
Baseline: 18565, Order: 197552, Start Time: 2013-12-18 08:27:56, End Time: 2013-12-18 13:39:39

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 12 (12 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 2 (7 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1096 (1091 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-08-BitOpsTest: 300.00% (0.0040 => 0.0160, std.dev.: 0.0038)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0022)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/stmtexpr: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-sha/security-sha: 16.67% (0.0960 => 0.1120, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-apml/fdtd-apml: 12.50% (0.1280 => 0.1440, std.dev.: 0.0053)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/chomp: 7.69% (0.2080 => 0.2240, std.dev.: 0.0060)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/heapsort: 6.90% (0.2320 => 0.2480, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: 4.72% (0.4240 => 0.4440, std.dev.: 0.0074)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac: 4.10% (0.9760 => 1.0160, std.dev.: 0.0128)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-dbl/LoopRestructuring-dbl: 1.32% (1.2161 => 1.2321, std.dev.: 0.0059)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/ocean/ocean: 15.79% (0.0760 => 0.0880, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 10.34% (0.1160 => 0.1280, std.dev.: 0.0030)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: -2.68% (1.1961 => 1.1641, std.dev.: 0.0121)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-dbl/CrossingThresholds-dbl: -1.84% (3.9202 => 3.8482, std.dev.: 0.0267)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/fib2: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-01-04-KNR-Args: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/stmtexpr: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/bicg/bicg: 46.67% (0.0600 => 0.0880, std.dev.: 0.0012)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-8: 42.86% (0.0280 => 0.0400, std.dev.: 0.0038)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/adpcm/rawcaudio/rawcaudio: 25.00% (0.0480 => 0.0600, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-sha/security-sha: 12.00% (0.1000 => 0.1120, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft: 6.06% (0.2640 => 0.2800, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: 1.70% (0.9401 => 0.9561, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-dbl/LoopRestructuring-dbl: 1.65% (1.2121 => 1.2321, std.dev.: 0.0059)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 3.38% (0.5920 => 0.6120, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: 1.04% (2.3121 => 2.3361, std.dev.: 0.0036)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Queens: -23.08% (0.0520 => 0.0400, std.dev.: 0.0045)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/2mm/2mm: -63.25% (90.4297 => 33.2341, std.dev.: 16.9843)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemm/gemm: -62.64% (46.3269 => 17.3091, std.dev.: 8.6765)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/3mm/3mm: -60.36% (125.5798 => 49.7831, std.dev.: 25.0766)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: -25.90% (3.2122 => 2.3801, std.dev.: 0.0877)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm/symm: -22.03% (37.8384 => 29.5018, std.dev.: 0.5366)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-dbl/CrossingThresholds-dbl: -1.84% (3.9202 => 3.8482, std.dev.: 0.0267)

Report Time: 2.30s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131223/ab82af42/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list