[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

[llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu]

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/17901?compare_to=17894&baseline=17660
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:21

Comparing:
     Run: 17901, Order: 196294, Start Time: 2013-12-03 17:32:34, End Time: 2013-12-03 19:19:34
      To: 17894, Order: 196287, Start Time: 2013-12-03 15:24:34, End Time: 2013-12-03 17:09:07
Baseline: 17660, Order: 195884, Start Time: 2013-11-27 22:43:57, End Time: 2013-11-28 00:31:03

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 24 (20 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 7 (8 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1079 (1082 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 29.64% (0.8882 => 1.1515, std.dev.: 0.0582)
  MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi: 28.21% (0.1996 => 0.2559, std.dev.: 0.0125)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet: 11.72% (33.0277 => 36.8976, std.dev.: 0.8856)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: 9.49% (15.6877 => 17.1760, std.dev.: 0.1273)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: 7.26% (1.9714 => 2.1145, std.dev.: 0.0122)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4: 6.38% (24.0737 => 25.6085, std.dev.: 0.3957)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-flt/Searching-flt: 6.10% (1.2230 => 1.2976, std.dev.: 0.0256)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 5.77% (1.3381 => 1.4153, std.dev.: 0.0152)
  MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: 4.64% (1.1989 => 1.2545, std.dev.: 0.0152)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt: 4.18% (1.2332 => 1.2847, std.dev.: 0.0075)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: 4.06% (0.8032 => 0.8358, std.dev.: 0.0052)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-flt/IndirectAddressing-flt: 3.59% (1.2794 => 1.3253, std.dev.: 0.0073)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Recurrences-flt/Recurrences-flt: 3.34% (1.2475 => 1.2892, std.dev.: 0.0125)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: 2.82% (1.3750 => 1.4138, std.dev.: 0.0114)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_abstraction: 1.94% (0.6232 => 0.6353, std.dev.: 0.0010)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: 11.86% (13.9460 => 15.6004, std.dev.: 0.2013)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/treeadd/treeadd: 6.02% (0.3571 => 0.3786, std.dev.: 0.0012)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt/gramschmidt: 4.25% (2.3643 => 2.4648, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: 3.96% (0.8783 => 0.9131, std.dev.: 0.0021)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/IRSmk/IRSmk: 3.79% (39.3367 => 40.8284, std.dev.: 0.5371)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fp-convert: 3.04% (7.4959 => 7.7238, std.dev.: 0.0745)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-flt/GlobalDataFlow-flt: 2.66% (3.8018 => 3.9028, std.dev.: 0.0325)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 2.60% (4.2726 => 4.3838, std.dev.: 0.0042)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 1.50% (8.5274 => 8.6555, std.dev.: 0.0109)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/ocean/ocean: -10.37% (0.1533 => 0.1374, std.dev.: 0.0059)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-bitcount/automotive-bitcount: -11.15% (0.1229 => 0.1092, std.dev.: 0.0024)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: -7.73% (1.3721 => 1.2661, std.dev.: 0.0399)
  MultiSource/Applications/aha/aha: -5.42% (3.7764 => 3.5719, std.dev.: 0.0053)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: -4.98% (5.6725 => 5.3898, std.dev.: 0.0252)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-dbl/Searching-dbl: -2.32% (6.9912 => 6.8291, std.dev.: 0.0121)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/bmm/bmm: -1.53% (2.6666 => 2.6259, std.dev.: 0.0075)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 27.69% (0.9018 => 1.1515, std.dev.: 0.0582)
  MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi: 26.62% (0.2021 => 0.2559, std.dev.: 0.0125)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: 9.11% (15.7419 => 17.1760, std.dev.: 0.1273)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/SmallPT/smallpt: 7.28% (0.1414 => 0.1517, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: 6.61% (1.9834 => 2.1145, std.dev.: 0.0122)
  MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: 5.59% (17.2968 => 18.2635, std.dev.: 0.3668)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-flt/CrossingThresholds-flt: 3.22% (1.2845 => 1.3259, std.dev.: 0.0128)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: 1.63% (0.8224 => 0.8358, std.dev.: 0.0052)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/sieve: 12.38% (6.7454 => 7.5804, std.dev.: 0.2277)
  MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/SPASS: 9.49% (8.5363 => 9.3462, std.dev.: 0.2849)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/treeadd/treeadd: 7.13% (0.3534 => 0.3786, std.dev.: 0.0012)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt/gramschmidt: 6.97% (2.3043 => 2.4648, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 4.78% (4.1840 => 4.3838, std.dev.: 0.0042)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fp-convert: 4.53% (7.3892 => 7.7238, std.dev.: 0.0745)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: 4.41% (0.8745 => 0.9131, std.dev.: 0.0021)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-flt/GlobalDataFlow-flt: 2.54% (3.8062 => 3.9028, std.dev.: 0.0325)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/fldry: 1.79% (0.6696 => 0.6816, std.dev.: 0.0016)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/nsieve-bits: 1.51% (1.7409 => 1.7672, std.dev.: 0.0063)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-apml/fdtd-apml: 1.16% (1.2463 => 1.2607, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/datamining/correlation/correlation: 1.14% (2.6658 => 2.6961, std.dev.: 0.0065)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-md5/enc-md5: -5.64% (0.1774 => 0.1674, std.dev.: 0.0016)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan/automotive-susan: -5.05% (1.1409 => 1.0833, std.dev.: 0.0201)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: -4.75% (1.3676 => 1.3027, std.dev.: 0.0186)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/nbench/nbench: -8.69% (23.4696 => 21.4291, std.dev.: 0.6871)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/syr2k/syr2k: -2.79% (6.0535 => 5.8847, std.dev.: 0.0523)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: -1.99% (5.4994 => 5.3898, std.dev.: 0.0252)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash2: -1.80% (3.6605 => 3.5947, std.dev.: 0.0252)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: -1.32% (7.9597 => 7.8549, std.dev.: 0.0368)

Report Time: 1.23s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131203/60df3d7f/attachment.html>