[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results
llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Sun Aug 25 17:38:29 PDT 2013
http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/14783?compare_to=14780&baseline=13681
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:15
Comparing:
Run: 14783, Order: 189200, Start Time: 2013-08-25 22:50:26, End Time: 2013-08-26 00:40:42
To: 14780, Order: 189199, Start Time: 2013-08-25 20:39:17, End Time: 2013-08-25 22:20:49
Baseline: 13681, Order: 186967, Start Time: 2013-07-23 18:12:31, End Time: 2013-07-23 20:01:57
===============
Tests Summary
===============
Performance Regressions: 14 (30 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 1 (31 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1092 (1046 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108
===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================
Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-blowfish/security-blowfish: 59.82% (0.3305 => 0.5282, std.dev.: 0.0213)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-stringsearch/office-stringsearch: 42.74% (0.1771 => 0.2528, std.dev.: 0.0144)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/network-patricia/network-patricia: 36.35% (0.0985 => 0.1343, std.dev.: 0.0032)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/IRSmk/IRSmk: 34.87% (0.1262 => 0.1702, std.dev.: 0.0069)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell: 31.20% (1.9607 => 2.5725, std.dev.: 0.0598)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-flt/GlobalDataFlow-flt: 12.94% (1.4866 => 1.6790, std.dev.: 0.0333)
Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: 10.66% (15.1073 => 16.7178, std.dev.: 0.1786)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-4: 5.75% (1.5382 => 1.6267, std.dev.: 0.0055)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso: 4.66% (0.6380 => 0.6677, std.dev.: 0.0082)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: 4.10% (7.1562 => 7.4496, std.dev.: 0.0554)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/IRSmk/IRSmk: 3.50% (40.0034 => 41.4037, std.dev.: 0.5275)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: 3.19% (5.5210 => 5.6969, std.dev.: 0.0407)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac: 2.60% (2.4948 => 2.5597, std.dev.: 0.0239)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-2d/fdtd-2d: 2.38% (4.4727 => 4.5793, std.dev.: 0.0220)
Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/nbench/nbench: -11.90% (21.7389 => 19.1512, std.dev.: 0.9282)
Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 1.07% (0.1306 => 0.1320, std.dev.: 0.0026)
================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================
Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-blowfish/security-blowfish: 44.51% (0.3655 => 0.5282, std.dev.: 0.0213)
SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack: 43.13% (0.0466 => 0.0667, std.dev.: 0.0011)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-stringsearch/office-stringsearch: 41.70% (0.1784 => 0.2528, std.dev.: 0.0144)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/network-patricia/network-patricia: 39.03% (0.0966 => 0.1343, std.dev.: 0.0032)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell: 30.78% (1.9671 => 2.5725, std.dev.: 0.0598)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/IRSmk/IRSmk: 12.12% (0.1518 => 0.1702, std.dev.: 0.0069)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-flt/GlobalDataFlow-flt: 9.33% (1.5357 => 1.6790, std.dev.: 0.0333)
Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-flt/LoopRerolling-flt: 66.74% (3.7285 => 6.2168, std.dev.: 0.1498)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: 50.52% (2.8867 => 4.3450, std.dev.: 0.0237)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: 49.92% (0.3171 => 0.4754, std.dev.: 0.0258)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/hash: 23.43% (4.1846 => 5.1652, std.dev.: 0.2469)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: 11.76% (14.9584 => 16.7178, std.dev.: 0.1786)
MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: 10.94% (7.0762 => 7.8501, std.dev.: 0.0276)
MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: 10.30% (7.1799 => 7.9196, std.dev.: 0.1981)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/InductionVariable-dbl/InductionVariable-dbl: 9.37% (5.4910 => 6.0055, std.dev.: 0.1122)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: 8.23% (1.2557 => 1.3591, std.dev.: 0.0120)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: 8.23% (48.3256 => 52.3042, std.dev.: 0.2781)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-flt/Expansion-flt: 6.93% (3.2027 => 3.4248, std.dev.: 0.0543)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl/Equivalencing-dbl: 5.51% (3.4085 => 3.5962, std.dev.: 0.0320)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-dbl/CrossingThresholds-dbl: 5.50% (5.5008 => 5.8031, std.dev.: 0.0298)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt: 4.47% (4.3151 => 4.5082, std.dev.: 0.0179)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-dbl/IndirectAddressing-dbl: 4.24% (5.1471 => 5.3654, std.dev.: 0.0303)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/StatementReordering-dbl/StatementReordering-dbl: 4.18% (3.3384 => 3.4781, std.dev.: 0.0463)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/whetstone: 4.17% (3.4559 => 3.6000, std.dev.: 0.0094)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 3.59% (6.1245 => 6.3443, std.dev.: 0.0614)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 3.42% (25.0200 => 25.8754, std.dev.: 0.2676)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash2: 3.13% (3.3877 => 3.4937, std.dev.: 0.0299)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: 3.02% (7.2315 => 7.4496, std.dev.: 0.0554)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-2d/fdtd-2d: 2.62% (4.4624 => 4.5793, std.dev.: 0.0220)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/matrix: 2.43% (1.7358 => 1.7779, std.dev.: 0.0040)
Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bisort/bisort: -31.34% (0.1072 => 0.0736, std.dev.: 0.0058)
MultiSource/Applications/ALAC/decode/alacconvert-decode: -19.77% (1.5228 => 1.2218, std.dev.: 0.0861)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/voronoi/voronoi: -18.37% (0.3576 => 0.2919, std.dev.: 0.0164)
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: -11.05% (19.4145 => 17.2685, std.dev.: 0.6988)
MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/ldecod: -9.67% (8.6720 => 7.8333, std.dev.: 0.1117)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-dbl/Packing-dbl: -6.88% (1.4514 => 1.3516, std.dev.: 0.0221)
MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: -4.62% (18.5029 => 17.6487, std.dev.: 0.0314)
Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: -38.06% (1.4194 => 0.8792, std.dev.: 0.1426)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/spectral-norm: -32.31% (2.1022 => 1.4230, std.dev.: 0.0135)
MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi: -27.18% (3.4923 => 2.5431, std.dev.: 0.0094)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-flt/Searching-flt: -24.59% (6.9552 => 5.2451, std.dev.: 0.0335)
MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/ldecod: -23.63% (0.0859 => 0.0656, std.dev.: 0.0032)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/perlin: -21.35% (4.5989 => 3.6169, std.dev.: 0.0423)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel: -14.10% (1.1996 => 1.0304, std.dev.: 0.0061)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/nbench/nbench: -12.98% (22.0083 => 19.1512, std.dev.: 0.9282)
MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -7.75% (3.5791 => 3.3016, std.dev.: 0.0844)
SingleSource/Regression/C/uint64_to_float: -4.96% (1.5184 => 1.4431, std.dev.: 0.0221)
SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -4.46% (21.6864 => 20.7191, std.dev.: 0.3645)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fbench: -4.34% (4.9602 => 4.7450, std.dev.: 0.0178)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog: -4.05% (1.1024 => 1.0577, std.dev.: 0.0019)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2: -3.83% (1.1032 => 1.0610, std.dev.: 0.0081)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-dbl/ControlFlow-dbl: -3.48% (6.0444 => 5.8341, std.dev.: 0.0492)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-pc1/enc-pc1: -3.43% (1.7207 => 1.6617, std.dev.: 0.0206)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-dbl/Packing-dbl: -3.04% (6.1482 => 5.9616, std.dev.: 0.0472)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl: -2.78% (5.2218 => 5.0764, std.dev.: 0.0439)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon: -2.45% (8.6172 => 8.4064, std.dev.: 0.0134)
MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: -2.37% (1.4030 => 1.3697, std.dev.: 0.0070)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft: -2.13% (3.7891 => 3.7083, std.dev.: 0.0047)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-rc4/enc-rc4: -2.06% (1.8144 => 1.7770, std.dev.: 0.0125)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/almabench: -2.03% (34.8438 => 34.1378, std.dev.: 0.0600)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-md5/enc-md5: -1.04% (2.1343 => 2.1122, std.dev.: 0.0045)
Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: -4.21% (0.1378 => 0.1320, std.dev.: 0.0026)
Report Time: 0.85s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20130825/fcc92532/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-testresults
mailing list