[llvm-testresults] lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Mon Jun 25 04:42:05 PDT 2012


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1480?compare_to=1475&baseline=999
Nickname: lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64:3
Comparing:
     Run: 1480, Order: 159127, Start Time: 2012-06-25 09:28:03, End Time: 2012-06-25 11:43:39
      To: 1475, Order: 159125, Start Time: 2012-06-25 06:43:17, End Time: 2012-06-25 09:01:00
Baseline: 999, Order: 158324, Start Time: 2012-06-11 20:29:30, End Time: 2012-06-11 22:44:50

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 0 (28 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 0 (2 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 894 (864 on baseline)
Total Tests: 894

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================
================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================
Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/instance-method-metadata: 7.74% (0.3488 => 0.3758, std. dev.: 0.0000)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/exceptions-4: 7.22% (0.3465 => 0.3715, std. dev.: 0.0002)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/exceptions-2: 7.20% (0.3446 => 0.3694, std. dev.: 0.0001)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/exceptions-3: 7.17% (0.3460 => 0.3708, std. dev.: 0.0003)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/trivial-interface: 7.09% (0.3442 => 0.3686, std. dev.: 0.0002)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/synchronized: 7.06% (0.3469 => 0.3714, std. dev.: 0.0001)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/for-in: 6.98% (0.3496 => 0.3740, std. dev.: 0.0004)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/property: 6.79% (0.3650 => 0.3898, std. dev.: 0.0002)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/exceptions: 6.70% (0.3643 => 0.3887, std. dev.: 0.0005)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/parameter-passing: 6.53% (0.3724 => 0.3967, std. dev.: 0.0003)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC++/Hello: 3.43% (0.5826 => 0.6026, std. dev.: 0.0002)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC++/property-reference-object: 3.23% (0.5889 => 0.6079, std. dev.: 0.0028)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell: 3.04% (0.5026 => 0.5179, std. dev.: 0.0004)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC++/property-reference: 2.87% (0.7171 => 0.7377, std. dev.: 0.0013)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso: 2.71% (1.6211 => 1.6651, std. dev.: 0.0064)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms: 2.53% (0.5900 => 0.6049, std. dev.: 0.0022)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc: 2.32% (3.5627 => 3.6453, std. dev.: 0.0052)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame: 2.31% (1.3152 => 1.3456, std. dev.: 0.0085)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm: 2.26% (0.4994 => 0.5107, std. dev.: 0.0010)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast: 2.16% (0.5000 => 0.5108, std. dev.: 0.0002)
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 1.99% (4.2109 => 4.2949, std. dev.: 0.0052)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 1.58% (2.0673 => 2.0999, std. dev.: 0.0019)
  MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: 1.52% (0.9909 => 1.0060, std. dev.: 0.0009)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/jpeg/jpeg-6a/cjpeg: 1.26% (1.9966 => 2.0218, std. dev.: 0.0031)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-jpeg/consumer-jpeg: 1.20% (1.9694 => 1.9931, std. dev.: 0.0015)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet: 1.19% (23.5202 => 23.7996, std. dev.: 0.0218)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset: 1.13% (4.4195 => 4.4693, std. dev.: 0.0007)
  MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc: 1.06% (1.5932 => 1.6101, std. dev.: 0.0034)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/constpool: -2.73% (2.4764 => 2.4089, std. dev.: 0.0174)
  MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc: -2.68% (11.9555 => 11.6349, std. dev.: 0.0105)

Report Time: 1.65s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20120625/e9e17a39/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list