[llvm-testresults] Grue-x86-64-O0-pic nightly tester results

[Evan Cheng]

This is an -O0 tester so the compile time regressions are really bad. Today's tester shows these have not recovered. Chris, I am assuming these are yours since codegen still uses dag isel even at -O0? If I remember correctly, we disable the more expensive isel optimizations at -O0. Have these changed?

Evan

On Mar 2, 2010, at 6:02 AM, daniel_dunbar at apple.com wrote:

> http://smooshlab.apple.com/perf/db_nt_internal/nightlytest/5896/
> Name:  grue.apple.com
> Nickname: Grue-x86-64-O0-pic:20
> 
> Run: 5896, Start Time: 2010-03-02 01:19:08, End Time: 2010-03-02 06:02:20
> Comparing To: 5864, Start Time: 2010-03-01 01:19:13, End Time: 2010-03-01 06:04:01
> 
> --- Changes Summary ---
> New Test Passes: 0
> New Test Failures: 0
> Added Tests: 0
> Removed Tests: 0
> Significant Changes: 26
> 
> --- Tests Summary ---
> Total Tests: 3582
> Total Test Failures: 1654
> 
> Total Test Failures By Type:
>  CBE: 62
>  JIT: 398
>  JIT codegen: 398
>  LLC-BETA: 398
>  LLC_BETA compile: 398
> 
> --- Changes Detail ---
> New Test Passes:
> 
> New Test Failures:
> 
> Added Tests:
> 
> Removed Tests:
> 
> Significant Changes in Test Results:
> LLC compile:
> MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 9.14% (1.5122 => 1.6504)
> MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/ldecod: 11.83% (0.8775 => 0.9813)
> MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: 12.72% (1.8677 => 2.1053)
> MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/SPASS: 6.94% (2.5081 => 2.6822)
> MultiSource/Applications/d/make_dparser: 10.85% (0.3430 => 0.3802)
> MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc: 7.37% (3.6318 => 3.8996)
> MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua: 8.47% (0.5208 => 0.5649)
> MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc: 12.05% (0.4921 => 0.5514)
> MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod: 7.74% (0.3655 => 0.3938)
> MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: 10.21% (1.0976 => 1.2097)
> MultiSource/Applications/treecc/treecc: 7.31% (0.3776 => 0.4052)
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000: 12.35% (0.4509 => 0.5066)
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet: 9.40% (3.7108 => 4.0595)
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso: 7.81% (0.5695 => 0.6140)
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs: 10.09% (0.5749 => 0.6329)
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-jpeg/consumer-jpeg: 11.78% (0.3547 => 0.3965)
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame: 12.35% (0.3660 => 0.4112)
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset: 14.89% (2.1545 => 2.4753)
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p: 8.80% (0.3297 => 0.3587)
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc: 11.54% (0.6094 => 0.6797)
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: 11.28% (0.7232 => 0.8048)
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/jpeg/jpeg-6a/cjpeg: 11.86% (0.3693 => 0.4131)
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4: 6.60% (4.8926 => 5.2154)
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: 6.84% (0.3157 => 0.3373)
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 6.46% (0.5105 => 0.5435)
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: 7.76% (0.3530 => 0.3804)
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-testresults mailing list
> llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults