[llvm-testresults] Grawp-PIC nightly tester results

[Evan Cheng]

On Nov 4, 2009, at 8:34 AM, Evan Cheng wrote:

>
> On Nov 4, 2009, at 6:21 AM, daniel_dunbar at apple.com wrote:
>
>>
>> New Test Failures:
>> Externals/SPEC/CFP2006/450_soplex/450_soplex [LLC, LLC compile]
>
> This is a coalescer bug (but not my last patch). I am looking.

This is actually a post-regalloc scheduling bug. David is looking into  
it.

Evan

>
> Evan
>
>> Externals/SPEC/CINT2006/483_xalancbmk/483_xalancbmk [CBE]
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4 [CBE]
>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container [CBE]
>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/moments [CBE]
>>
>> Added Tests:
>>
>> Removed Tests:
>>
>> Significant Changes in Test Results:
>> LLC:
>> Externals/SPEC/CINT2000/197_parser/197_parser: -6.29% (3.1800 =>
>> 2.9800)
>> Externals/SPEC/CINT2006/445_gobmk/445_gobmk: -8.00% (0.2500 =>  
>> 0.2300)
>> Externals/SPEC/CINT2006/471_omnetpp/471_omnetpp: -5.94% (2.0200 =>
>> 1.9000)
>> LLC compile:
>> Externals/Povray/povray: 16.53% (9.0510 => 10.5468)
>> Externals/SPEC/CFP2000/188_ammp/188_ammp: 7.88% (1.6388 => 1.7680)
>> Externals/SPEC/CFP2006/433_milc/433_milc: 6.85% (1.0161 => 1.0857)
>> Externals/SPEC/CINT2000/175_vpr/175_vpr: 6.75% (1.8058 => 1.9277)
>> Externals/SPEC/CINT2000/252_eon/252_eon: 75.22% (2.6167 => 4.5851)
>> Externals/SPEC/CINT2000/255_vortex/255_vortex: 5.22% (12.2802 =>
>> 12.9210)
>> Externals/SPEC/CINT2000/300_twolf/300_twolf: 5.24% (2.7345 => 2.8777)
>> Externals/SPEC/CINT2006/456_hmmer/456_hmmer: 5.51% (2.2779 => 2.4033)
>> Externals/SPEC/CINT2006/458_sjeng/458_sjeng: 54.39% (1.3745 =>  
>> 2.1221)
>> MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/SPASS: 8.35% (7.3205 => 7.9317)
>> MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: 11.26% (0.3010 => 0.3349)
>> MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc: 31.85% (8.6269 => 11.3743)
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame: 5.62%
>> (1.5012 => 1.5856)
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset:
>> 9.62% (7.7342 => 8.4786)
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell: 8.76%
>> (0.9360 => 1.0180)
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler: 13.89%
>> (0.3786 => 0.4312)
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl: 39.28% (0.3210 =>
>> 0.4471)
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football: 6.53% (0.5853
>> => 0.6235)
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/simulator/simulator: 14.70%
>> (0.3933 => 0.4511)
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-smail/unix-smail: 5.53%
>> (0.2912 => 0.3073)
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-tbl/unix-tbl: 19.34% (0.5496
>> => 0.6559)
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 29.59% (0.7684 => 0.9958)
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms: 5.87% (0.2367 => 0.2506)
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4: 5.37% (5.9598 =>  
>> 6.2799)
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-testresults mailing list
>> llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-testresults mailing list
> llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults