[llvm-testresults] Grawp-PIC i386 nightly tester results

[Evan Cheng]

How about with PIC and -disable-fp-elim?

Evan

On Feb 11, 2009, at 12:26 PM, Dan Gohman wrote:

> 403.gcc and fannkuch pass for me with TOT right now, with PIC  
> options enabled.
>
> Dan
>
> On Feb 11, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Dan Gohman wrote:
>
>> I'll take a look at it soon.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> On Feb 11, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Evan Cheng wrote:
>>
>>> yacr2 is mine (spiller change). It's unclear what broke fannkuch and
>>> 403.gcc. Dan, any ideas?
>>>
>>> Evan
>>>
>>> On Feb 11, 2009, at 6:58 AM, Apache wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://llvm.org/nightlytest/test.php?machine=372&night=9670
>>>> Name: grawp.apple.com
>>>> Nickname: Grawp-PIC
>>>> Buildstatus: OK
>>>>
>>>> New Test Passes:
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>> New Test Failures:
>>>> Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4 []
>>>> Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/fannkuch [LLC compile, , ]
>>>> Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset []
>>>> Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2 [LLC compile, ]
>>>> SPEC/CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc [LLC compile, ]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Added Tests:
>>>> test/CodeGen/X86/maskmovdqu.ll
>>>> test/CodeGen/X86/pr3495.ll for PR3495
>>>> test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/dbginfo.ll
>>>> test/Transforms/SimplifyLibCalls/2009-02-11-NotInitialized.ll for
>>>> PR3520
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Removed Tests:
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>> Significant changes in test results:
>>>> Bytecode:
>>>> singlesource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/fannkuch: 27.20% (2000 =>  
>>>> 1456)
>>>> singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ary3: -5.08% (944 => 992)
>>>> singlesource/Regression/C++/2003-05-14-array-init: -5.88% (544 =>
>>>> 576)
>>>> singlesource/Regression/C++/2003-09-29-NonPODsByValue: -6.06% (528
>>>> => 560)
>>>> singlesource/Regression/C++/2008-01-29-ParamAliasesReturn: -5.71%
>>>> (560 => 592)
>>>> singlesource/Regression/C++/EH/ConditionalExpr: 40.28% (1152 =>  
>>>> 688)
>>>> singlesource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count-2: 22.58% (1984 =>
>>>> 1536)
>>>> singlesource/Regression/C++/EH/dead_try_block: -6.06% (528 => 560)
>>>> singlesource/Regression/C++/EH/exception_spec_test: 7.88% (2640 =>
>>>> 2432)
>>>> singlesource/Regression/C++/EH/function_try_block: 39.26% (3872 =>
>>>> 2352)
>>>> singlesource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_rethrow: 7.29% (1536 => 1424)
>>>> singlesource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_throw: 14.49% (1104 => 944)
>>>> singlesource/Regression/C++/EH/throw_rethrow_test: 13.64% (2112 =>
>>>> 1824)
>>>> singlesource/Regression/C++/pointer_member: -5.56% (576 => 608)
>>>> singlesource/Regression/C++/pointer_method: -5.26% (608 => 640)
>>>> singlesource/Regression/C++/short_circuit_dtor: 20.41% (784 => 624)
>>>> singlesource/Regression/C/badidx: -5.66% (848 => 896)
>>>> singlesource/UnitTests/SignlessTypes/cast2: -5.71% (560 => 592)
>>>> multisource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1: 6.14% (6256 =>
>>>> 5872)
>>>> multisource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/fsm/fsm: 8.87% (1984 => 1808)
>>>> GCCAS:
>>>> external/SPEC/CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa: -6.14% (3.5079 => 3.7233)
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> llvm-testresults mailing list
>>>> llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-testresults mailing list
>> llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults
>