[llvm-testresults] Grawp-PIC nightly tester results

Daniel Dunbar daniel at zuster.org
Fri Aug 14 08:20:40 PDT 2009


>From this, and other, reports, it looks like compile time hasn't
returned to where it used to be (note that grawp and geryon seemed to
skip yesterday).

Dan, I presume this is due to .s printing related things, is there
still more work being done there?

 - Daniel

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 6:06 AM, <daniel_dunbar at apple.com> wrote:
> http://smooshlab.apple.com/perf.cgi/db_nt_internal/nightlytest//1238
> Name:  grawp.apple.com
> Nickname: Grawp-PIC:4
> Buildstatus: OK
>
> Run: 1238, Start Time: 2009-08-14 03:31:23
> Comparing To: 1208, Start Time: 2009-08-12 03:48:44
>
> --- Changes Summary ---
> New Test Passes: 0
> New Test Failures: 0
> Added Tests: 0
> Removed Tests: 0
> Significant Changes: 31
>
> --- Tests Summary ---
> Total Tests: 3852
> Total Test Failures: 1759
>
> Total Test Failures By Type:
>  CBE: 43
>  JIT: 428
>  JIT codegen: 428
>  LLC: 2
>  LLC compile: 2
>  LLC-BETA: 428
>  LLC_BETA compile: 428
>
> --- Changes Detail ---
> New Test Passes:
>
> New Test Failures:
>
> Added Tests:
>
> Removed Tests:
>
> Significant Changes in Test Results:
> LLC:
>  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: 6.58% (0.7600 => 0.8100)
>  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-CRC32/telecomm-CRC32: -6.67% (0.3000 => 0.2800)
> LLC compile:
>  Externals/Povray/povray: 158.29% (8.0047 => 20.6751)
>  Externals/SPEC/CFP2000/177_mesa/177_mesa: 63.91% (5.3976 => 8.8473)
>  Externals/SPEC/CFP2000/188_ammp/188_ammp: 26.84% (1.4790 => 1.8760)
>  Externals/SPEC/CFP2006/433_milc/433_milc: 6.77% (0.7930 => 0.8467)
>  Externals/SPEC/CFP2006/444_namd/444_namd: 17.49% (2.2245 => 2.6135)
>  Externals/SPEC/CFP2006/447_dealII/447_dealII: 28.55% (5.7593 => 7.4035)
>  Externals/SPEC/CFP2006/450_soplex/450_soplex: 61.48% (3.5077 => 5.6642)
>  Externals/SPEC/CINT2000/175_vpr/175_vpr: 10.70% (1.5403 => 1.7051)
>  Externals/SPEC/CINT2000/252_eon/252_eon: 79.50% (2.2175 => 3.9805)
>  Externals/SPEC/CINT2000/253_perlbmk/253_perlbmk: 9.25% (9.3704 => 10.2369)
>  Externals/SPEC/CINT2000/300_twolf/300_twolf: 6.33% (2.3286 => 2.4759)
>  Externals/SPEC/CINT2006/400_perlbench/400_perlbench: 12.79% (17.6578 => 19.9160)
>  Externals/SPEC/CINT2006/445_gobmk/445_gobmk: 158.67% (9.7602 => 25.2465)
>  Externals/SPEC/CINT2006/456_hmmer/456_hmmer: 16.17% (1.9809 => 2.3012)
>  Externals/SPEC/CINT2006/464_h264ref/464_h264ref: 19.71% (5.8437 => 6.9954)
>  Externals/SPEC/CINT2006/471_omnetpp/471_omnetpp: 25.80% (10.5614 => 13.2861)
>  Externals/SPEC/CINT2006/483_xalancbmk/483_xalancbmk: 61.03% (38.3277 => 61.7203)
>  MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: 25.77% (7.1955 => 9.0496)
>  MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc: 84.53% (1.3701 => 2.5282)
>  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: 10.90% (6.2932 => 6.9791)
>  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac: 5.06% (0.3459 => 0.3634)
>  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs: 19.55% (1.8314 => 2.1894)
>  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame: 34.33% (1.2859 => 1.7274)
>  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset: 10.67% (6.5868 => 7.2897)
>  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc: 18.06% (2.9884 => 3.5281)
>  MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4: 22.87% (5.0591 => 6.2162)
>  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: 8.20% (1.6482 => 1.7834)
> CBE:
>  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: -7.14% (0.2800 => 0.2600)
>  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: -8.33% (0.7200 => 0.6600)
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-testresults mailing list
> llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults
>




More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list