<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 10:34 AM Serge Pavlov via cfe-dev <<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Let me describe a real life example.<div><br></div><div>There is a realtime program that processes float values from a huge array. Calculations do not produce NaNs and do not expect them. Using -ffinite-math-only substantially speeds up the program, so it is highly desirable to use it. The problem is that the array contains NaNs, they mark elements that should not be processed.</div><div><br></div><div>An obvious solution is to check an element for NaN, and if it is not, process it. Now there is no clean way to do so. Only workarounds, like using integer arithmetics. The function 'isnan' became useless. And there are many cases when users complain of this optimization.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I personally would separate the "pre-processing" of the input in a compilation unit that isn't compiled with -ffinite-math-only and isolate the perf-critical routines to be compiled with this flag if needed (I'd also like a sanitizer to have a build mode that validate that no NaNs are ever seen in this routines).</div><div><br></div><div>In general, Krzysztof's reasoning in this thread makes sense to me, in particular in terms of being consistent with how we treat isnan(x) vs isnan(x+0) for example.</div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Mehdi</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>Thanks,<br></div><div><div><div dir="ltr">--Serge<br></div></div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 12:09 AM Chris Tetreault <<a href="mailto:ctetreau@quicinc.com" target="_blank">ctetreau@quicinc.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">If the issue is that users want their asserts to fire, then they should be encouraged to only enable fast math in release builds.
<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div style="border-style:solid none none;border-top-width:1pt;border-top-color:rgb(225,225,225);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev-bounces@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev-bounces@lists.llvm.org</a>> <b>On Behalf Of
</b>Serge Pavlov via llvm-dev<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, September 9, 2021 9:53 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Krzysztof Parzyszek <<a href="mailto:kparzysz@quicinc.com" target="_blank">kparzysz@quicinc.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> LLVM Developers <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>>; <a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Should isnan be optimized out in fast-math mode?<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p align="center" style="text-align:center"><strong><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black;background-color:yellow">WARNING:</span></strong><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black;background-color:yellow">
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 11:29 PM Krzysztof Parzyszek <<a href="mailto:kparzysz@quicinc.com" target="_blank">kparzysz@quicinc.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<blockquote style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-width:1pt;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">This goes back to what these options actually imply. The interpretation that I favor is “this code will never see a NaN”, or “the program can assume that no floating point expression
will evaluate to a NaN”. The benefit of that is that it’s intuitively clear. In that case “isnan(x)” is false, because x cannot be a NaN. There is no distinction between “isnan(x+x)” and “isnan(x)”. If the user wants to preserve “isnan(x)”, they can apply
some pragma (which clang may actually have already).<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">It is apparent simplicity. As the discussion in gcc mail list demonstrated (<a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/544641.html" target="_blank">https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/544641.html</a>) this is actually
an impromissing way. From a practical viewpoint it is also a bad solution as users cannot even check the assertions.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-width:1pt;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">To be honest, I’m not sure that I understand your argument. Are you saying that under your interpretation we could optimize “isnan(x+x) -> false”, but not “isnan(x) -> false”?<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Argument of `isnan(x+x)` is a result of arithmetic operation. According to the meaning of -ffinite-math-only it cannot produce NaN. So this call can be optimized out. In the general case `isnan(x)` value may be, say, loaded from memory.
Load is not an arithmetic operation, so nothing prevents from loading NaN. Optimizing the call out is dangerous in this case.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-width:1pt;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas">--
</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8pt;font-family:Consolas">Krzysztof Parzyszek
<a href="mailto:kparzysz@quicinc.com" target="_blank"><span style="color:rgb(5,99,193)">kparzysz@quicinc.com</span></a> AI tools development</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div style="border-style:solid none none;border-top-width:1pt;border-top-color:rgb(225,225,225);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Serge Pavlov <<a href="mailto:sepavloff@gmail.com" target="_blank">sepavloff@gmail.com</a>>
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, September 9, 2021 11:10 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Krzysztof Parzyszek <<a href="mailto:kparzysz@quicinc.com" target="_blank">kparzysz@quicinc.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Chris Lattner <<a href="mailto:clattner@nondot.org" target="_blank">clattner@nondot.org</a>>; James Y Knight <<a href="mailto:jyknight@google.com" target="_blank">jyknight@google.com</a>>; LLVM Developers <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>>;
<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Should isnan be optimized out in fast-math mode?<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p align="center" style="text-align:center"><strong><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black;background-color:yellow">WARNING:</span></strong><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black;background-color:yellow">
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 8:30 PM Krzysztof Parzyszek via cfe-dev <<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<blockquote style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-width:1pt;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin:5pt 0in 5pt 4.8pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">If we say that the fast-math flags are “enabling optimizations that the presence of nans otherwise prohibits”, then there is no reason for clang to keep calls to “isnan” around,
or to keep checks like “fpclassify(x) == it’s_a_nan” unfolded. These are exactly the types of optimizations that the presence of NaNs would prohibit.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Transformation 'x * 0 -> 0' is an optimization allowed in the absence of nans as arguments, because it produces a program that behaves identically under the given restrictions.
Replacement of `isnan(x + x)` is also an optimization under the same restrictions. Replacement of `isnan(x)` in general case is not, because we cannot assume that x cannot be a NaN.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-width:1pt;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin:5pt 0in 5pt 4.8pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I understand the need for having some NaN-handling preserved in an otherwise finite-math code. We already have fast-math-related attributes attached to each function in the LLVM
IR, so we could introduce a source-level attribute for enabling/disabling these flags per function.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">GCC allows using `#pragma GCC optimize ("finite-math-only")` or `#pragma GCC optimize ("no-finite-math-only")` to enable/disable optimization per function basis. Clang could support
this pragmf or maybe `#pragma clang fp` can be extended to support similar functionality.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-width:1pt;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin:5pt 0in 5pt 4.8pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Consolas">--
</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8pt;font-family:Consolas">Krzysztof Parzyszek
<a href="mailto:kparzysz@quicinc.com" target="_blank"><span style="color:rgb(5,99,193)">kparzysz@quicinc.com</span></a> AI tools development</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div style="border-style:solid none none;border-top-width:1pt;border-top-color:rgb(225,225,225);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> cfe-dev <<a href="mailto:cfe-dev-bounces@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev-bounces@lists.llvm.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Chris Lattner via cfe-dev<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 8, 2021 5:51 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> James Y Knight <<a href="mailto:jyknight@google.com" target="_blank">jyknight@google.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> LLVM Developers <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>>; Clang Dev <<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Should isnan be optimized out in fast-math mode?<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p align="center" style="text-align:center"><strong><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black;background-color:yellow">WARNING:</span></strong><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black;background-color:yellow">
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Sep 8, 2021, at 3:27 PM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I expressed my strong support for this on the previous thread, but I'll just repost the most important piece...
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I believe the proposed semantics from the Clang level ought to be:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> The -ffinite-math-only and -fno-signed-zeros options do not impact the ability to accurately load, store, copy, or pass or return such values from general function calls. They
also do not impact any of the "non-computational" and "quiet-computational" IEEE-754 operations, which includes classification functions (fpclassify, signbit, isinf/isnan/etc), sign-modification (copysign, fabs, and negation `-(x)`), as well as the totalorder and
totalordermag functions. Those correctly handle NaN, Inf, and signed zeros even when the flags are in effect. These flags <i>do</i> affect the behavior of other expressions and math standard-library calls, as well as comparison operations.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">FWIW, I completely agree - these flags are about enabling optimizations that the presence of nans otherwise prohibits. We shouldn’t take a literal interpretation of an old GCC
manual, as that would not be useful.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">If we converge on this definition, I think it should be documented. This is a source of confusion that comes up periodically.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-Chris<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I would not expect this to have an actual negative impact on the performance benefit of those flags, since the optimization benefits mainly arise from comparisons and the general
computation instructions which are unchanged.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">In further support of this position, I note that the previous thread uncovered at least one vendor -- Apple (<a href="https://opensource.apple.com/source/Libm/Libm-2026/Source/Intel/math.h.auto.html" target="_blank">https://opensource.apple.com/source/Libm/Libm-2026/Source/Intel/math.h.auto.html</a>)
-- going out of their way to cause isnan and friends to function properly with -ffast-math enabled.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 1:02 PM Serge Pavlov via cfe-dev <<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-width:1pt;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin:5pt 0in 5pt 4.8pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi all,<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">One of the purposes of `llvm::isnan` was to help preserve the check made by `isnan` if fast-math mode is<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">specified (<a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854" target="_blank">https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854</a>). I'd like to describe reason for that and propose to use the behavior<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">implemented in that patch.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">The option `-ffast-math` is often used when performance is important, as it allows a compiler to generate faster code.
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">This option itself is a collection of different optimization techniques, each having its own option. For this topic only the<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">option `-ffinite-math-only` is of interest. With it the compiler treats floating point numbers as mathematical real numbers,<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">so transformations like `0 * x -> 0` become valid.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">In clang documentation (<a href="https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#cmdoption-ffast-math" target="_blank">https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#cmdoption-ffast-math</a>)
this option is described as:<br>
<br>
"Allow floating-point optimizations that assume arguments and results are not NaNs or +-Inf."<br>
<br>
GCC documentation (<a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html" target="_blank">https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html</a>) is a bit more concrete:<br>
<br>
"Allow optimizations for floating-point arithmetic that assume that arguments and results are not NaNs or +-Infs."<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">**What is the issue?**<br>
<br>
C standard defines a macro `isnan`, which can be mapped to an intrinsic function provided by the compiler. For both<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">clang and gcc it is `__builtin_isnan`. How should this function behave if `-ffinite-math-only` is specified? Should it make a<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">real check or the compiler can assume that it always returns false?<br>
<br>
GCC optimizes out `isnan`. It follows from the viewpoint that (<a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724#c1" target="_blank">https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724#c1</a>):<br>
<br>
"With -ffinite-math-only you are telling that there are no NaNs and thus GCC optimizes isnan (x) to 0."<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Such treatment of `-ffinite-math-only` has sufficient drawbacks. In particular it makes it impossible to check validity of<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">data: a user cannot write<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">assert(!isnan(x));<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">because the compiler replaces the actual function call with its expected value. There are many complaints in GCC bug<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">tracker (for instance
<a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84949" target="_blank">https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84949</a> or
<a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724" target="_blank">https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724</a>)<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">as well as in forums (<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47703436/isnan-does-not-work-correctly-with-ofast-flags" target="_blank">https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47703436/isnan-does-not-work-correctly-with-ofast-flags</a>
or <br>
<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22931147/stdisinf-does-not-work-with-ffast-math-how-to-check-for-infinity" target="_blank">https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22931147/stdisinf-does-not-work-with-ffast-math-how-to-check-for-infinity</a>). Proposed<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">solutions are using integer operations to make the check, to turn off `-ffinite-math-only` in some parts of the code or to<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">ensure that libc function is called. It clearly demonstrates that `isnan` in this case is useless, but users need its functionality<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">and do not have a proper tool to make required checks. The similar direction was criticized in llvm as well (<a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D18513#387418" target="_blank">https://reviews.llvm.org/D18513#387418</a>).<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">**Why imposing restrictions on floating types is bad?**<br>
<br>
If `-ffinite-math-only` modifies properties of `double` type, several issues arise, for instance:<br>
- What should return `std::numeric_limits<double>::has_quiet_NaN()`?<br>
- What body should have this function if it is used in a program where some functions are compiled with `fast-math` and some without?<br>
- Should inlining of a function compiled with `fast-math` to a function compiled without it be prohibited in inliner?<br>
- Should `std::isnan(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN())` be true?<br>
<br>
If the type `double` cannot have NaN value, it means that `double` and `double` under `-ffinite-math-only` are different types<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">(<a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/544641.html" target="_blank">https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/544641.html</a>). Such a way can
solve these problems but it is so expensive<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">that hardly it has a chance to be realized.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">**The solution**<br>
<br>
Instead of modifying properties of floating point types, the effect of `-ffinite-math-only` can be expressed as a restriction on<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">operation usage. Actually clang and gcc documentation already follows this way. Fast-math flags in llvm IR also are attributes<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">of instructions. The only question is whether `isnan` and similar functions are floating-point arithmetic.<br>
<br>
>From a practical viewpoint, treating non-computational functions as arithmetic does not add any advantage. If a code extensively<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">uses `isnan` (so could profit by their removal), it is likely it is not suitable for -ffinite-math-only. This interpretation however creates<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">the problems described above. So it is profitable to consider `isnan` and similar functions as non-arithmetical.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">**Why is it safe to leave `isnan`?**<br>
<br>
The probable concern of this solution is deviation from gcc behavior. There are several reasons why this is not an issue.<br>
<br>
1. -ffinite-math-only is an optimization option. A correct program compiled with -ffinite-math-only and without it should behave<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> identically, if conditions for using -ffinite-math-only are fulfilled. So making the check cannot break functionality.<br>
2. `isnan` is implemented by libc, which can map it to a compiler builtin or use its own implementation, depending on<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> configuration options. `isnan` implemented in libc obviously always does the real check.<br>
3. ICC and MSVC preserve `isnan` in fast-math mode.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">The proposal is to not consider `isnan` and other such functions as arithmetic operations and do not optimize them out<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">just because -ffinite-math-only is specified. Of course, there are cases when `isnan` may be optimized out, for instance,<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt">`isnan(a + b)` may be optimized if -ffinite-math-only is in effect due to the assumption (result of arithmetic operation is not NaN).<br>
<br>
What are your opinions?<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,<br>
--Serge<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
cfe-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
cfe-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
cfe-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>