<div dir="auto">I use to be subscribed to the weekly report and I was actually addressing regressions.</div><div dir="auto">The annoying part is the large number of false positive that needed triage...</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 2:00 PM Luke Benes via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">> * it was often regressing<br>
If there is interest, I'd be willing to help with the cov-build,<br>
<br>
> * afaik, nobody but me was paying attention to newly detected defects (if I am wrong, please let me know and I can have a look).<br>
In my experience, a weekly report of new defects helps keep engagement up and issues down. Here is an example:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/New-Defects-reported-by-Coverity-Scan-for-LibreOffice-td4301033.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/New-Defects-reported-by-Coverity-Scan-for-LibreOffice-td4301033.html</a><br>
<br>
Would a weekly scan report be welcome here? <br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>