<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">My expectation was that they would continue to be fed from the updates to the svn repo. But again, I don't recall where I got that impression from. It may have been a bad assumption on my part.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Tom.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Anton Korobeynikov <anton@korobeynikov.info> <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, February 25, 2020 12:36 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Tom Honermann <thonerma@synopsys.com><br>
<b>Cc:</b> llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org; Michael Price <mprice@synopsys.com>; Tim Prince <trprince@synopsys.com>; Christopher Lapkowski <lapkow@synopsys.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [llvm-dev] Status of the git.llvm.org git repos<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hello<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">These repos were populated from SVN. Noone worked on migration of them<br>
to be pulled from monorepo as far as I know.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 8:28 PM Tom Honermann via llvm-dev<br>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> I was under the impression that the (non-monorepo) separate LLVM and Clang git repos hosted at git.llvm.org would be maintained for a year after the transition to the mono repo. I don't recall where I got that impression from; probably from some of the many
emails on the migration topic. I noticed today that updates to these repos ceased on October 22nd of last year following transition to the mono repo. Was I simply mistaken that these repos were not going to be maintained along with the (read-only) svn repo?
We had not planned to complete our own transition to the mono repo until a little later this year, but if these repos are no longer maintained, we'll have to readjust our priorities.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> I'm aware of the guidance on how to transition (<a href="https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html#moving-local-branches-to-the-monorepo">https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html#moving-local-branches-to-the-monorepo</a>) and am not seeking any
advice on how to do so.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Tom.<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev">https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-- <br>
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov<br>
Department of Statistical Modelling, Saint Petersburg State University<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img border="0" width="1" height="1" style="width:.0083in;height:.0083in" id="_x0000_i1025" src="https://gml.email/v1.1/t/image/VUlEfDIxOTY3OTBmLWViMjAtNDAzYi05YzRjLTExMDcxYTM1YjUxMHxUaG9tYXMuSG9uZXJtYW5uQHN5bm9wc3lzLmNvbQ.gif"><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>