<div dir="auto"><div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jan 14, 2020, 22:58 Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word;line-break:after-white-space">Hi Everyone,<br><br>Numerous people have been bringing up challenges with consensus driven decision making in the LLVM community. After considering this and seeing the frustrations it is causing many people, I think we should make a formal process change to help improve decision making going forward.<br><br>Here is the outline of the <a href="https://gist.github.com/lattner/e3679998a7609c99b1243f09d30f0132" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">draft proposal</a>. Caveats: this is itself just a draft proposal to inspire discussion not a mandate - I welcome feedback, thoughts and concerns, ideas of how to make this better, or better ideas/approaches overall on how we can level up the community.<br><br>Please let me know what you think, thanks!</div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Looks like a good idea to me! I particularly like that it is similar to Rust's RFC model, which has seemed to work out really well for Rust.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Jacob</div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote></div></div></div>