<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">+1 on not adding the new API as well.<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On May 4, 2019, at 10:52 PM, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="auto" class=""><span style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12.8px" class="">+1 on not adding the new API</span></div><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, May 4, 2019, 11:51 AM David Blaikie via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">+1, if we're voting. I don't think it adds to the readability of code<br class="">
for me personally.<br class="">
<br class="">
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 11:47 AM Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev<br class="">
<<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br class="">
><br class="">
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019, 02:37 David Chisnall via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br class="">
>><br class="">
>> On 22/04/2019 15:15, Don Hinton via llvm-dev wrote:<br class="">
>> > Although there were a few no votes, it looks like there's a consensus<br class="">
>> > for adding a `isa_and_nonnull` type operator. While there were some who<br class="">
>> > preferred `isa_nonnull`, it wasn't overwhelming, and since<br class="">
>> > `isa_and_nonnull` is already committed, I'm going to leave it as<br class="">
>> > `isa_and_nonnull` for the time being.<br class="">
>><br class="">
>> Maybe I missed something, but it looked to me as if the consensus was<br class="">
>> that `isa_and_some_words<T>(foo)` imposed a higher cognitive load on the<br class="">
>> reader than `foo && isa<T>(foo)`, as well as being more to type in most<br class="">
>> cases, so wasn't worth adding.<br class="">
><br class="">
><br class="">
> FWIW, I agree with this and Bogner: this doesn't seem like an improvement worth the cost.<br class="">
><br class="">
>><br class="">
>> David<br class="">
>> _______________________________________________<br class="">
>> LLVM Developers mailing list<br class="">
>> <a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br class="">
>> <a href="https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><br class="">
><br class="">
> _______________________________________________<br class="">
> LLVM Developers mailing list<br class="">
> <a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br class="">
> <a href="https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><br class="">
_______________________________________________<br class="">
LLVM Developers mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br class="">
<a href="https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><br class="">
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">LLVM Developers mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br class="">https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>