<div dir="ltr">OK -- let's try this again:<div><br><div>Based on the previous discussion, and the lack of any further support for the zippered proposal in the last month, let's call this discussion done. We will move forward with the original monorepo proposal. (I'll send a followup on the other thread with the current status.)<br></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 11:26 AM Mehdi AMINI <<a href="mailto:joker.eph@gmail.com">joker.eph@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Le lun. 3 déc. 2018 à 07:47, James Y Knight via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>I don't feel like I can unilaterally declare this topic closed, since there was an objection to that last time.</div><div><br></div><div>But with no additional feedback after another week, I'd still really like to close this out, and start moving forward with the original plan, again...</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I agree, does not seem like this got enough traction at this point.</div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Mehdi</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 2:28 PM James Y Knight <<a href="mailto:jyknight@google.com" target="_blank">jyknight@google.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>It's been a week and a half more (much of which was holiday the US, granted). If there's no more arguments in favor of going with a zipper repo, I'd really like to wrap this thread up.</div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 1:32 AM Justin Bogner <<a href="mailto:mail@justinbogner.com" target="_blank">mail@justinbogner.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div dir="ltr"></div><div dir="ltr">Yes, I’m still trying to evaluate the migration script’s downsides as compared to the zipper approach’s downsides. Sorry that I got a little held up, but I have to balance evaluating this with getting other work done. </div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">I should have some feedback to a few of the responses on this thread next week. I really don’t think I can respond in a useful/productive way before I’ve finished these experiments.</div><div dir="ltr"><br>On Nov 15, 2018, at 16:07, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">I think Justin was still experimenting a bit w/ the migration script. I'd like to at least let him get back to this with the results of that?</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:55 PM James Y Knight via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Based on the feedback so far, I propose that we call this discussion done -- we will not go with this zippered proposal, but will proceed with <a href="https://github.com/llvm-git-prototype/llvm/" target="_blank">https://github.com/llvm-git-prototype/llvm/</a>.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 5:06 PM David Greene via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
> What is the status with this proposal? It has been 2 weeks now since<br>
> the initial email and it seems like the discussion is slowing down. Do<br>
> we still want to consider this zippered approach as a possibility for the<br>
> official repo? <br>
<br>
I have very strong feedback from the engineer who does our upstream<br>
merges that he does NOT want to see this zippered repository. A clean<br>
linear history makes understanding merges much easier.<br>
<br>
James made a number of other important points about limitations of the<br>
zippered repository:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-November/127460.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-November/127460.html</a><br>
<br>
git-bisect being more complicated is a deal-breaker for me. Checking<br>
out a random commit and only getting part of the project is just odd.<br>
<br>
-David<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>LLVM Developers mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a></span><br></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>
</blockquote></div>