<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:11 PM David Woodhouse <<a href="mailto:dwmw2@infradead.org">dwmw2@infradead.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 22:00 +0000, Chandler Carruth wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:55 PM David Woodhouse <<a href="mailto:dwmw2@infradead.org" target="_blank">dwmw2@infradead.org</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
> > OK... which __x86_indirect_thunk* symbols *are* being used by Clang<br>
> > in<br>
> > 32-bit mode?<br>
> __x86_indirect_thunk<br>
> __x86_indirect_thunk_eax<br>
> __x86_indirect_thunk_ecx<br>
> __x86_indirect_thunk_edx<br>
<br>
Thanks. And you'll *never* do __x86_indirect_thunk (the ret-equivalent<br>
one) on 64-bit, right?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Correct. </div></div></div>