<div dir="ltr">Yes, we do see performance benefits for this change on some google internal benchmarks.<div><br></div><div>Dehao</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:18 AM, 陳韋任 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chenwj.cs97g@g2.nctu.edu.tw" target="_blank">chenwj.cs97g@g2.nctu.edu.tw</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Besides speccpu, any other real-world applications benefit from this option?</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Regards,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">chenwj</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="h5">2017-05-19 6:30 GMT+08:00 Dehao Chen via llvm-dev <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>></span>:<br></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5"><div dir="ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>I'm proposing to make vectorizer-maximize-bandw<wbr>idth on by default for loop vectorizer because it should generally help performance.</div><div><br></div><div>I've tested the performance impact on Intel sandybridge machine with speccpu benchmarks:</div><div><br></div><div><div>           Benchmark             Base:Reference   (1)  </div><div>------------------------------<wbr>-------------------------</div><div>spec/2006/fp/C++/444.namd                 26.84  -0.31%</div><div>spec/2006/fp/C++/447.dealII               46.19  +0.89%</div><div>spec/2006/fp/C++/450.soplex               42.92  -0.44%</div><div>spec/2006/fp/C++/453.povray               38.57  -2.25%</div><div>spec/2006/fp/C/433.milc                   24.54  -0.76%</div><div>spec/2006/fp/C/470.lbm                    41.08  +0.26%</div><div>spec/2006/fp/C/482.sphinx3                47.58  -0.99%</div><div>spec/2006/int/C++/471.omnetpp             22.06  +1.87%</div><div>spec/2006/int/C++/473.astar               22.65  -0.12%</div><div>spec/2006/int/C++/483.xalancbm<wbr>k           33.69  +4.97%</div><div>spec/2006/int/C/400.perlbench             33.43  +1.70%</div><div>spec/2006/int/C/401.bzip2                 23.02  -0.19%</div><div>spec/2006/int/C/403.gcc                   32.57  -0.43%</div><div>spec/2006/int/C/429.mcf                   40.35  +0.27%</div><div>spec/2006/int/C/445.gobmk                 26.96  +0.06%</div><div>spec/2006/int/C/456.hmmer                  24.4  +0.19%</div><div>spec/2006/int/C/458.sjeng                 27.91  -0.08%</div><div>spec/2006/int/C/462.libquantum            57.47  -0.20%</div><div>spec/2006/int/C/464.h264ref               46.52  +1.35%</div><div><br></div><div>geometric mean                                   +0.29%</div><div><br></div><div>  Scores are benchmark specific.</div></div><div><br></div><div>We do have regression on 453.povray, but it's due to secondary effects as all hot functions are the same. I've also tested the code size impact, it does not change for tested speccpu benchmarks.</div><div><br></div><div>I've prepared <a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D33341" rel="noreferrer" style="font-size:12.8px" target="_blank">https://reviews.llvm.<wbr>org/D33341</a> to do this.</div><div><br></div><div>I really appreciate if the community can help test the performance impact of this change on other architectures so that we can decide if this should go target-dependent.</div><div><br></div><div>Any comments/concerns?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Dehao</div></div>
<br></div></div>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="m_-1496353057319846569gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)<br>Homepage: <a href="https://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj" target="_blank">https://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/<wbr>~chenwj</a></div></div></div>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>