<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/10/2017 7:06 AM, Jonas Paulsson
via llvm-dev wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:58c62bc6-334b-b5ab-1eff-f17caff68733@linux.vnet.ibm.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div class="phui-timeline-core-content"><span
class="transaction-comment" data-sigil="transaction-comment"
data-meta="0_10">
<div class="phabricator-remarkup">
<p>Hi</p>
<p>Regarding: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://reviews.llvm.org/rL180834"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://reviews.llvm.org/rL180834</a><br>
</p>
<p>I tried my old patch for InstCombiner for shuffles, which
was a handling for <a
href="https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=30630"
class="remarkup-link" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=30630</a>.
When I applied it a month ago, it produced nearly no
change. But now I do see some files that needs this
optimization, and I suspect it has to do with this revert.
</p>
<p>I wonder what the status is on getting this reverted
patch recommitted? Should I post my patch for InstCombiner
on Phabricator?</p>
</div>
</span></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
See <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D31509">https://reviews.llvm.org/D31509</a>.<br>
<br>
-Eli<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project</pre>
</body>
</html>