<div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal">Hi all,<span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">We’re hoping to replace the demangler in some of our tools
to use the LLVM demangler. We’d like to enhance it with missing functionality
(legal names that it cannot demangle) and provide a set of tests that we use
with the demangler that we currently use.<span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">The demangler that is currently in the LLVM tree appears to
be a copy of the libc++abi implementation, and there appears to be chat about
replacing it with the fast demangler implementation in LLDB.<span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">Could you please advise if we should put our contributing efforts into enhancing the fast demangler in LLDB so that it can replace the existing one or just work on what is already there.<span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">Regards,<span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif">David Bozier<br>
Technical lead of linker and binutils<br>
SN Systems - Sony Interactive Entertainment<br>
</span><a href="http://www.snsystems.com/"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif">http://www.snsystems.com</span></a><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif"><br>
</span><a href="https://twitter.com/SNSystemsEU"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif">https://twitter.com/SNSystemsEU</span></a><span></span></p></div>