<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jul 21, 2016, at 2:11 PM, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="">On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:55 PM Renato Golin via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 21 July 2016 at 18:12, Justin Lebar <<a href="mailto:jlebar@google.com" target="_blank" class="">jlebar@google.com</a>> wrote:<br class="">
> llvm, clang, clang-tools-extra, lld, polly, lldb, llgo, compiler-rt,<br class="">
> openmp, and parallel-libs.<br class="">
<br class="">
I really, *really* would like to see libc++ / abi / unwind. :)<br class=""></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">FWIW, I agree for all the reasons you outline.</div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">Because it is hard to agree on what to put here, I’d have every single LLVM project that is not dying/very experimental research/… inside the repo.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">— </div><div class="">Mehdi</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>