<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jun 28, 2016, at 1:48 PM, C Bergström via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><br class=""><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:43 AM, vivek pandya via llvm-dev <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr" class="">Hello Quentin,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I see your work on shrink-wrapping optimization at <a href="http://reviews.llvm.org/rL236507" target="_blank" class="">http://reviews.llvm.org/rL236507</a></div><div class="">IPRA has benefited shrink-wrapping optimization ( I have noticed that on sqlite3 test-case) so I did read Fred Chow's paper and compare that approach with yours I did not understand much of your work :-( in comparison to original paper but I feel that current approach is not generating same results as data flow analysis based approach. Also I do not understand one of your comment on review :</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><ol style="margin: 12px 0px 12px 30px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; list-style-position: initial; font-family: 'Segoe UI', 'Segoe UI Web Regular', 'Segoe UI Symbol', 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" class=""><li style="margin:0px;padding:0px;border:0px" class="">Right now, we only support one save point and one restore point. At some point we can expand this to several save point and restore point, </li></ol></blockquote><div class=""><font face="Segoe UI, Segoe UI Web Regular, Segoe UI Symbol, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" class="">Do you here meant to get more effective results as original paper? With IPRA should we go for more aggressive version or the current version is as capable as original paper ?</font></div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I can't make any promises, but Fred is a friend of mine - Please email me offlist if you need an extra hand with this and think his input may be of value.<br class=""></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div>Could he send his input on the list instead of having to side-channel?</div><div>I’m sure it can be interesting for everyone :)</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Thanks,</div><div><br class=""></div><div>— </div><div>Mehdi</div><div><br class=""></div></div></body></html>