<div dir="ltr">I think r257832  introduced this regression. I'm looking into it.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jack Howarth via llvm-dev <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">While checking on the status of<br>
<a href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22657" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22657</a> in current llvm/clang<br>
trunk, I noticed that the previous work-around for recovering the<br>
missing in-lining of the  c-ray 1.1 benchmarks of passing -mllvm<br>
-inline-threshold=500 no longer works. This regression doesn't exist<br>
in the 3.8.0 release. Any idea what commit in 3.9svn might have<br>
introduced this regression?<br>
       Jack<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>