<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On May 13, 2016, at 10:56 AM, Tarun Prabhu <<a href="mailto:tarunprabhu@gmail.com" class="">tarunprabhu@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word" class=""><div class=""><div class="">Any reason you're not using static archives? It seems to correspond more to what you're trying to do (i.e. LTO all the code in a single binary).</div></div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I just want to avoid modifying the application's build system. If there's no other way, I could go in and change the build scripts, but I'd like to avoid doing that as much as possible. </div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div></div>If you're doing LTO with shared library, usually you're still producing shared library that are not bitcode (i.e. the LTO is performed separately within the boundary of each library).<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Other people may have different experience, CC Rafael maybe?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">-- </div><div class="">Mehdi</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>