<div dir="ltr"><div>Ah, yes, thank you very much for that hint.<br><br></div>Phil<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 5/9/2016 2:43 PM, Phil Tomson via llvm-dev wrote:<br>
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">
<br>
        MachineBasicBlock::instr_iterator II = MFI->instr_begin();<br>
        while( II != MFI->instr_end()) {<br></span>
          [...]<span class=""><br>
                 MachineBasicBlock::instr_iterator NII = std::next(II);<br></span>
[...]<span class=""><br>
                 MI.eraseFromParent();<br>
                 II = NII;<br>
               }<br>
             }<br>
           }<br>
           ++II;<br>
<br>
Unfortunately, this leads to a segfault. Is this the proper way to do<br>
this or is there another suggested way of doing it?<br>
</span></blockquote>
<br>
What if II is the last instruction?<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
-Krzysztof<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>