<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On May 5, 2016, at 6:53 PM, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><br class=""><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Justin Bogner via llvm-dev <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="">Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" class="">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> writes:<br class="">
> I want to be super clear, the foundation is not insisting on anything, nor<br class="">
> can it.<br class="">
><br class="">
> **I** am making this proposal as an active and long time contributor to<br class="">
> LLVM. Many other members of the community have also expressed support for<br class="">
> this on this and previous threads. But our support is given as individual<br class="">
> members of the community and it should be valued as such.<br class="">
<br class="">
</span>Just to add a little bit to this, it's very much a mischaracterization<br class="">
of the situation to imply that the code of conduct idea is some sort of<br class="">
demand coming from the foundation.</blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I can see how one would interpret Chris' statement:<br class=""><br class="">"""</div><div class=""><span style="font-size:12.8px" class="">Renato, I’m confused about your approach here. At this point, you seem persistently interested in discussing whether having a code of conduct is the right thing or not. This is missing the point: we’re committed to it, and want to make sure that we get reasonable processes and policies in place.</span><br style="font-size:12.8px" class=""><br style="font-size:12.8px" class=""><span style="font-size:12.8px" class="">If we find out that they are problematic in practice, we can and will course correct.<br class=""></span>"""</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">as "some sort of demand coming from the foundation". In context, my reading of "we're committed to it" is precisely "demand coming from the foundation".</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Maybe a clarification is needed?</div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>Here’s your clarification: we == Chandler & I.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>-Chris</div><br class=""></body></html>