<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=""><br>
</span>Given that you're going to store metadata for 4-64 cache lines of user<br>
memory in a single shadow memory cache line, do you anticipate<br>
additional slowdown related to false sharing of shadow memory in<br>
multithreaded applications? Any plans to deal with that?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The optimization of check-before-write would avoid most writes and so alleviate the false sharing problem.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Alexander Potapenko<br>
Software Engineer<br>
<br>
Google Germany GmbH<br>
Erika-Mann-Straße, 33<br>
80636 München<br>
<br>
Geschäftsführer: Matthew Scott Sucherman, Paul Terence Manicle<br>
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891<br>
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg<br>
<span class=""><br>
--<br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efficiency-sanitizer" group.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="mailto:efficiency-sanitizer%2Bunsubscribe@google.com">efficiency-sanitizer+unsubscribe@google.com</a>.<br>
To post to this group, send email to <a href="mailto:efficiency-sanitizer@google.com">efficiency-sanitizer@google.com</a>.<br>
</span>To view this discussion on the web visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/a/google.com/d/msgid/efficiency-sanitizer/CAG_fn%3DUbdJhC439heRJ%3DtbVM8f5FKzBPTNkCxBQr0m9ObQV-fw%40mail.gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://groups.google.com/a/google.com/d/msgid/efficiency-sanitizer/CAG_fn%3DUbdJhC439heRJ%3DtbVM8f5FKzBPTNkCxBQr0m9ObQV-fw%40mail.gmail.com</a>.<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>