<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>David,<br><br></div>Could you give us an update on the status of typeless pointer work? How much work is left and when you think it might be ready?<br><br></div>Thanks<br></div>Ehsan<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:12 PM, David Blaikie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dblaikie@gmail.com" target="_blank">dblaikie@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="">On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">Hi,<div><br></div><div>How do it interact with the "typeless pointers" work?</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>Right - the goal of the typeless pointer work is to fix all these bugs related to "didn't look through bitcasts" in optimizations. Sometimes that's going to mean more work (because the code is leaning on the absence of bitcasts & the presence of convenient (but not guaranteed) type information to inform optimization decisions) but if we remove typed pointers while keeping optimization quality in the cases we have today, then we should've also fixed the cases that were broken because the type information didn't end up aligning to produce the optimal output.<br><br>& I know I've been off the typeless pointer stuff for a few months working on llvm-dwp - but happy for any help (the next immediate piece is probably figuring out teh right representation for byval and inalloca - there were some code reviews sent out for that that I'll need to come back around to - but also any optimizations people want to help rework/improve would be great too & I can provide some techniques/tools to help people approach those)<br><br>- Dave</div><div><div class="h5"><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Mehdi</div><div><br><div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div><div>On Mar 16, 2016, at 6:41 AM, Ehsan Amiri via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:</div><br></div></div><div><div><div><div dir="ltr">=== PROBLEM === (See this bug <a href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26445" target="_blank">https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26445</a>)<br><br>IR contains code for loading a float from float * and storing it to a float * address. After canonicalization of load in InstCombine [1], new bitcasts are added to the IR (see bottom of the email for code samples). This prevents select speculation in SROA to work. Also after SROA we have bitcasts from int32 to float. (Whereas originally after instCombine, bitcasts are only done on pointer types).<br><br>=== PROPOSED SOLUTION===<br><br>[1] implies that we need load canonicalization when we load a value only to store it again. The reason is to avoid generating slightly different code (due to different ways of adding bitcasts), in different situations. In all examples presented in [1] there is a non-zero number of bitcasts. I think when we load a value of type T from a T* address and store it as a type T value to one or more T* address (and there is no other use or store), we can redefine canonical form to mean there should not be any bitcasts. So we still have a canonical form, but its definition is slightly different.<br><br>=== REASONS FOR / AGAINST===<br><br>Hal Finkel warns that while this may be useful for power pc, this may hurt more than one other platform and become a very large project. Despite this he is fine with bringing up the issue to the mailing list to get feedback, mostly because this seems inline with our future direction of having a unique type for all pointers. (Hal please correct me if I misunderstood your comment)<br><br>This is a much simpler fix compared to alternatives. (ignoring potential regressions)<br><br>=== ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION ===<br><br>Fix select speculation in SROA to see through bitcasts. Handle remaining bitcasts during code gen. Other alternative solutions are welcome.<br><br>Should I implement the proposed solution or is it too risky? I understand that we may need to undo it if it breaks too many things. Comments are welcome.<br><br><br>[1] <a href="http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-January/080956.html" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-January/080956.html</a> r226781 git commit id: b778cbc0c8<br><br><br><br>Code Samples (only relevant part is copied):<br><br>-------------------- Before Canonicalization (contains call to std::max): -------------------- <br>entry:<br> %max_value = alloca float, align 4<br> %1 = load float, float* %input, align 4, !tbaa !1<br> store float %1, float* %max_value, align 4, !tbaa !1<br><br>for.body:<br> %call = call dereferenceable(4) float* @_ZSt3maxIfERKT_S2_S2_(float* dereferenceable(4) %max_value, float* dereferenceable(4) %arrayidx1)<br> %3 = load float, float* %call, align 4, !tbaa !1<br> store float %3, float* %max_value, align 4, !tbaa !1<br><br>-------------------- After Canonicalization (contains call to std::max):-------------------- <br><br>entry:<br> %max_value = alloca float, align 4<br> %1 = bitcast float* %input to i32*<br> %2 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4, !tbaa !1<br> %3 = bitcast float* %max_value to i32*<br> store i32 %2, i32* %3, align 4, !tbaa !1<br><br>for.body:<br> %call = call dereferenceable(4) float* @_ZSt3maxIfERKT_S2_S2_(float* nonnull dereferenceable(4) %max_value, float* dereferenceable(4) %arrayidx1)<br> %5 = bitcast float* %call to i32*<br> %6 = load i32, i32* %5, align 4, !tbaa !1<br> %7 = bitcast float* %max_value to i32*<br> store i32 %6, i32* %7, align 4, !tbaa !1<br><br>-------------------- After SROA (the call to std::max is inlined now):-------------------- <br>entry:<br> %max_value.sroa.0 = alloca i32<br> %0 = bitcast float* %input to i32*<br> %1 = load i32, i32* %0, align 4, !tbaa !1<br> store i32 %1, i32* %max_value.sroa.0<br><br>for.body: <br> %max_value.sroa.0.0.max_value.sroa.0.0.6 = load i32, i32* %max_value.sroa.0<br> %3 = bitcast i32 %max_value.sroa.0.0.max_value.sroa.0.0.6 to float<br> %max_value.sroa.0.0.max_value.sroa_cast8 = bitcast i32* %max_value.sroa.0 to float*<br> %__b.__a.i = select i1 %cmp.i, float* %arrayidx1, float* %max_value.sroa.0.0.max_value.sroa_cast8<br> %5 = bitcast float* %__b.__a.i to i32*<br> %6 = load i32, i32* %5, align 4, !tbaa !1<br> store i32 %6, i32* %max_value.sroa.0<br><br>-------------------- After SROA when Canonicalization is turned off-------------------- <br>entry:<br> %0 = load float, float* %input, align 4, !tbaa !1<br><br>for.cond: ; preds = %for.body, %entry<br> %max_value.0 = phi float [ %0, %entry ], [ %.sroa.speculated, %for.body ]<br><br>for.body:<br> %1 = load float, float* %arrayidx1, align 4, !tbaa !1<br> %cmp.i = fcmp olt float %max_value.0, %1<br> %.sroa.speculate.load.true = load float, float* %arrayidx1, align 4, !tbaa !1<br> %.sroa.speculated = select i1 %cmp.i, float %.sroa.speculate.load.true, float %max_value.0<br></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>LLVM Developers mailing list<br><a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div></div><br></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>