<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">+Michael Liao, who originally implemented the –DAG feature AFAICT. Hopefully the address I found by web searching is correct.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">If you want to try turning it into an error, you could find all the places we do use interspersed -DAG and -NOT and have a discussion about whether they're more buggy than they are useful/correct.<span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I errored on –NOT followed by –DAG, which caught 44 tests (two of which are in FileCheck's own tests, but those are not elaborate enough to tell what the intent
was). As a side project this will take a little time to work through, especially as about half are in CodeGen tests for unfamiliar targets.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Commentary in FileCheck itself can easily be interpreted to mean the intent was that –NOT would scan the region between the points defined by the last match
of the preceding DAG group (which the code gets right) and the first match of the following DAG group (which the code does not get right). But the commentary is not really that clear.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">--paulr<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie@gmail.com]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, March 07, 2016 10:59 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Robinson, Paul<br>
<b>Cc:</b> llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [llvm-dev] FileCheck: combining -DAG and -NOT<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Yeah, fair - thanks for the explanation/correction/etc. <br>
<br>
That does seem a bit odd. Dunno.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Robinson, Paul <<a href="mailto:Paul_Robinson@playstation.sony.com" target="_blank">Paul_Robinson@playstation.sony.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Nope. Sorry, your expectation is incorrect.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">"BETWEEN BEFORE AFTER" would be accepted, because: (1) the first –DAG matches BEFORE; (2) the –NOT
range starts at the preceding match-point, i.e. the (end of the) BEFORE, thus does not find BETWEEN; (3) the second –DAG starts at the same point as the –NOT.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">That is, the first –DAG and the following –NOT *are* ordered; the –NOT and the subsequent –DAG are
*not* ordered.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">You most certainly cannot intermix them freely and expect them all to look at the same range; that
is explicitly not the documented (or actual) behavior.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">--paulr</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><a name="34590580__MailEndCompose"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span></a><o:p></o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> David Blaikie [mailto:<a href="mailto:dblaikie@gmail.com" target="_blank">dblaikie@gmail.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, March 07, 2016 8:43 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Robinson, Paul<br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [llvm-dev] FileCheck: combining -DAG and -NOT</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">I'd probably have expected the behavior it has - that -DAG and -NOT are not ordered with respect to each other, and form a bag of things ordered with respect to enclosing CHECK:s.<br>
<br>
If you want to try turning it into an error, you could find all the places we do use interspersed -DAG and -NOT and have a discussion about whether they're more buggy than they are useful/correct.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">If you look at the FileCheck documentation page:<br>
<a href="http://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/FileCheck.html" target="_blank">http://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/FileCheck.html</a><br>
you'll find this intriguing example of combining -DAG with -NOT<br>
(slightly amended to avoid some potential confusion):<br>
<br>
; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE<br>
; CHECK-NOT: BETWEEN<br>
; CHECK-DAG: AFTER<br>
<br>
The page says this will reject the sequence "AFTER BEFORE", which is<br>
correct. It's intuitively obvious that it will also reject the text<br>
"BEFORE BETWEEN AFTER" as well.<br>
<br>
Pop Quiz: Will it accept or reject "BEFORE AFTER BETWEEN"?<br>
No, don't go try it, that's cheating; what do you *think* will happen?<br>
Take a minute, I won't mind.<br>
---<br>
<br>
So, here's the story.<br>
<br>
Normally a -NOT line will scan the text between the points where the<br>
preceding and following CHECK lines match. By that mental model, you'd<br>
expect the first -DAG to find BEFORE, the second -DAG to find AFTER, and<br>
then -NOT would verify the absence of "BETWEEN" between those two points.<br>
All very intuitive, and I've certainly seen tests written to expect that.<br>
<br>
However, things get a little funky when you have -NOT followed by -DAG.<br>
What's the endpoint of the -NOT search? The thing that follows isn't<br>
a CHECK, it's a CHECK-DAG, except that -NOT is already kind of DAG-ish<br>
so you have two DAG-ish groups staring at each other wondering who will<br>
go first.<br>
<br>
In this case, turns out, it's the -NOT who blinks first. The endpoint<br>
of the search is implicitly the end-of-input. The Pop Quiz answer is:<br>
*Rejected.* The BETWEEN occurs after BEFORE, and before the end-of-input.<br>
<br>
Here's the real question: *Should* FileCheck run the second -DAG group<br>
before it runs the -NOT group? Then the range for the -NOT would be<br>
bounded by the matching points for the surrounding -DAG lines, which<br>
probably matches what basically everybody expects to happen.<br>
<br>
Or, leave things as they are, and add a cautionary tale to the FileCheck<br>
documentation page? Given there's an actual documentation example, it<br>
would seem inappropriate to make it an *error* if a -NOT is followed<br>
by a -DAG!<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
--paulr<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>