<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jul 19, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Chris Lattner <<a href="mailto:clattner@apple.com" class="">clattner@apple.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=""><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">On Jul 19, 2015, at 6:04 AM, Renato Golin <<a href="mailto:renato.golin@linaro.org" class="">renato.golin@linaro.org</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class="">On 18 July 2015 at 00:51, Jim Grosbach <<a href="mailto:grosbach@apple.com" class="">grosbach@apple.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">The goal of CODE_OWNERS.txt is to give high level<br class="">guidance for who to ask questions of, seek out for code review, find for<br class="">partnering up for collaborating on crazy ideas, etc.. The right person for a<br class="">great deal of that on LLD+Darwin is Lang, and it would be a shame to have<br class="">the official listing not reflect that.<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">I agree with this point of view.<br class=""><br class="">Lang knows the code well, is willing to own it and has direct access to Nick.<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">It seems to me we should just keep it<br class="">simple and list both Nick and Lang in CODE_OWNERS.txt. Assuming Nick and<br class="">Lang are both OK with that, of course.<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">Which file is this? I can't find Nick on any CODE_OWNERS.txt files.<br class="">And LLD has none.<br class=""><br class="">If Nick is the owner of LLD and Rui owns LLD+COFF+ELF, I can't see why<br class="">we shouldn't put Lang as LLD+Darwin and let the hierarchical chain<br class="">mean the rest.<br class=""></blockquote><br style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=""><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">Please just add a CODE_OWNERS.TXT file to the root of the lld repo, copying the formatting from the llvm or clang one. Thanks!</span><br style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=""></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div></div><div class="">SGTM. Some sub-projects have been piggy-backing on the LLVM file. Makes sense to split them into their own thing in the relevant projects themselves, especially when it’s multiple people, though, you’re right.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Nick, can you take care of that?</div></body></html>