<div dir="ltr">I asked a similar question last year <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22255634/llvm-arbitrary-precision-integer">here</a>. Operations on types iN  with no direct translation into one assembly instruction seem to be translated into several ones correctly.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-02-02 14:49 GMT+01:00 Wu Zhao <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bluechristlove@163.com" target="_blank">bluechristlove@163.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="line-height:1.7;color:#000000;font-size:14px;font-family:Arial"><div>Hi everyone!</div><div>    Here, I have a question and am curious about i128. I want to know how the LLVM handle i128, because many compiler backend doesn't support i128 directly. So I am very curious and want to how the llvm handle this situation? Besides i128, such as i256, i512, even i24? Thanks.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Best Regards</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>Wu Zhao</div></font></span></div><br><br><span title="neteasefooter"><span></span></span><br>_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu">LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu</a>         <a href="http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu" target="_blank">http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>