<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br><div><div>On Oct 6, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Rui Ueyama <<a href="mailto:ruiu@google.com">ruiu@google.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Nick Kledzik <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kledzik@apple.com" target="_blank">kledzik@apple.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><span class="">On Oct 6, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Rui Ueyama <<a href="mailto:ruiu@google.com" target="_blank">ruiu@google.com</a>> wrote:<br></span><div><span class=""><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">Looks like most people in this thread support using LLVM style in LLD. I also had an offline discussion and many people wanted to have one coding style in all LLVM projects. So I'm convinced that we should do that.<div><br></div><div>I'm going to create a patch to rename all variables if no one objects.</div></div></blockquote></span><div>I object!</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'd like to hear the reason. :)</div></div></div></div></blockquote><br></div><div>Right. Specifically, why is it for the “greater good” to perpetuate a schism between lld and the rest of llvm?</div><br><div>-Chris</div></body></html>