<div dir="ltr">+the people I hashed this out with so many months ago<div><br></div><div>I think it's a reasonable proposal, but obviously I floated it. :) Let's try to get a second opinion.</div><div><br></div><div>Again, it's a syntax something like:</div><div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">define void @foo() prefix [i8* x 2] { i8* @a, i8* @b } prologue [i8 x 4] c"\xde\xad\xbe\xef" { ret void }</span><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Ben Gamari <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bgamari.foss@gmail.com" target="_blank">bgamari.foss@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">Ben Gamari <<a href="mailto:bgamari.foss@gmail.com">bgamari.foss@gmail.com</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
> Rafael EspĂndola <<a href="mailto:rafael.espindola@gmail.com">rafael.espindola@gmail.com</a>> writes:<br>
><br>
>>> I suspected this was the case. Is a rework of prefix support likely to<br>
>>> make it in for 3.5?<br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>> Unlikely. It has branched already and I don't know of anyone working on it.<br>
>><br>
> Fair enough. If there is consensus around a reasonably concrete proposal<br>
> I would be happy to put together a patch (acknowledging that it probably<br>
> won't make it in for 3.5). Does Reid's proposal seem reasonable?<br>
><br>
</div></div>Ping?<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>