<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:59 PM, John Criswell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:criswell@illinois.edu" target="_blank">criswell@illinois.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>Dear All,<br>
      <br>
      Historically, we *have* permitted job announcements for jobs that
      require or desire expertise with LLVM or one of it's
      sub-projects.  To the best of my knowledge, we've never required
      that the position announcement state that the job will contribute
      directly to the LLVM project (or its sub-projects) or that the
      code created by the position be open source.<br>
      <br>
      As an example, please see
      <a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-May/072938.html" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-May/072938.html</a>
      and
      <a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-August/033695.html" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-August/033695.html</a>.<br>
      <br>
      Using this criteria, I believe that Ted's post is on-topic
      (although I agree that it should have stated the connection with
      LLVM more prominently).</div></blockquote></div><br>The connection or relevance of LLVM experience really isn't clear... "<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">Familiarity with LLVM or Clang a plus, but not required." makes it seem like it is not terribly relevant, which was the source of my concern.</span></div>
</div>