<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br><div><div>On Dec 14, 2013, at 5:25 AM, reed kotler <<a href="mailto:rkotler@mips.com">rkotler@mips.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">On 12/14/2013 04:06 AM, <a href="mailto:sebald.ziegler.maillist@ikolus.de">sebald.ziegler.maillist@ikolus.de</a> wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">On Friday, December 13, 2013 23:15:45 reed kotler wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">Has anyone done any comparisons of bitcode vs native code (.o) in terms<br>of size?<br><br>TIA.<br><br>Reed<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>LLVM Developers mailing list<br><a href="mailto:LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu">LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu</a> <a href="http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu">http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu</a><br><a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev</a><br></blockquote>maybe<br><a href="http://llvm.org/pubs/2003-10-01-LLVA.ps">http://llvm.org/pubs/2003-10-01-LLVA.ps</a> -> page 10<br>is what you are looking for.<br></blockquote><br>Just what the doctor ordered.<br><br>Awesome paper.<br></blockquote></div><br><div>Note that that paper is <i>very</i> old in LLVM terms. 2003 pre-dates the modern bitcode format. Prior to LLVM 2.0, we used a different binary format called bytecode instead.</div><div><br></div><div>—Owen</div></body></html>