<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Jim Grosbach <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:grosbach@apple.com" target="_blank">grosbach@apple.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><br><div><div><div class="h5"><div>On Oct 25, 2013, at 6:14 PM, David Peixotto <<a href="mailto:dpeixott@codeaurora.org" target="_blank">dpeixott@codeaurora.org</a>> wrote:</div>
<br><blockquote type="cite"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
<div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><b><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif"><span> </span>Jim Grosbach [<a href="mailto:grosbach@apple.com" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">mailto:grosbach@apple.com</a>]<span> </span><br>
<b>Sent:</b><span> </span>Friday, October 25, 2013 4:31 PM<br><b>To:</b><span> </span>David Peixotto<br><b>Cc:</b><span> </span>Renato Golin; LLVM Dev<br><b>Subject:</b><span> </span>Re: [LLVMdev] Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler<u></u><u></u></span></div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div>
<div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">On Oct 25, 2013, at 3:53 PM, David Peixotto <<a href="mailto:dpeixott@codeaurora.org" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">dpeixott@codeaurora.org</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><br><br><u></u><u></u></div><div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
<span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Hi Renato, Thanks for the thoughtful reply. Please find my thoughts below.</span><u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
<span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">--<span> </span>Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation</span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></div></div>
<div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></div></div><div style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-color:blue;border-left-width:1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4pt">
<div><div style="border-style:solid none none;border-top-color:rgb(181,196,223);border-top-width:1pt;padding:3pt 0in 0in"><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><b><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif">From:</span></b><span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif"> </span></span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif">Renato Golin [<a href="mailto:renato.golin@linaro.org" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">mailto:renato.golin@linaro.org</span></a>]<span> </span><br>
<b>Sent:</b><span> </span>Friday, October 25, 2013 1:11 PM<br><b>To:</b><span> </span>David Peixotto<br><b>Cc:</b><span> </span>LLVM Dev; Logan Chien; Gabor Ballabas; Rafael Espíndola; Richard Barton; Amara Emerson<br><b>Subject:</b><span> </span>Re: Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler</span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"> <u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
On 25 October 2013 18:33, David Peixotto <<a href="mailto:dpeixott@codeaurora.org" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">dpeixott@codeaurora.org</span></a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><blockquote style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin:5pt 0in 5pt 4.8pt"><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
Both armasm and gnu as support an ldr pseudo instruction for loading<br>constants that lowers to either a mov, movn, or a pc-relative ldr from the<br>constant pool. It would be great if the llvm integrated assembler could<br>
support this feature as well.<u></u><u></u></div></blockquote><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"> <u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
Hi David,<u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"> <u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
As much as I think that it's important to add support for old codebases to be compiled, I also have to consider the importance of compatibility and compiler sanity.<u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
<u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">Adding support for this GNU extension (that ARMCC also seem to support) can:<u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"> <u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
1. Add multiple representations to the same operation, which is fine when you're converting ASM into binary, but not so much when you're doing the reverse.<u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
<span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">By the reverse, do you mean converting binary to asm? If so I do not think there would be an issue here because we would never need to generate the ldr pseudo instruction. It is really a convenience for the programmer much like macros. Once it has been converted to mov/ldr+constant pool there would be no need to go the opposite direction. I think it is similar to macros in that regard in that we do not need to reconstruct the macro after it has been processed by the assembler to generate the final output.</span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
I’m not sure macros are a good analogy, but there are other pseudo-instructions that we’re not always able to reconstruct in disassembled code back to how the user wrote them. Or if we do, it’s purely via heuristic methods. I don’t see this as a big issue.<u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
Do the ARM usages include allowing a single pseudo-instruction to expand to multiple real instructions? For example, a movw/movt pair? If so, I’m *very* opposed to that part. A single assembler instruction, pseudo or otherwise, should represent a single instruction in the final output. Even with a single instruction, I’m still leery, as it makes the source unclear whether a constant load is a plain ‘move’ instruction or a memory reference. That makes it very difficult to read the assembly and do any sort of thinking about performance considerations.<u></u><u></u></div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
<span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">I believe that the ldr pseudo will always expand to a single instruction (mov, movn, or ldr). I see that armasm also supports a mov32 pseudo instruction that expands to movw/movt pair. GCC does not support mov32 and I’m not proposing that we add it to llvm.<u></u><u></u></span></div>
</div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 5.25pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div></div><div>OK. If we can restrict this to always only generating a single instruction, I’m less concerned. Still not a huge fan, but not actively opposed. Thanks for checking into that.</div>
<div class="im"><br><blockquote type="cite"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
<div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt 5.25pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><br><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u><u></u></span></div><div><div style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-color:blue;border-left-width:1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4pt">
<div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">We have been trying to deprecate pre-UAL and GNU-extensions as much as possible, and this is a move that is supported from most of the ARM LLVM community. The main reason is, as I said, to be able to come to and from ASM, having the same canonical representation. This will make it a lot easier to test the compiler and to avoid silent asm/disasm failures not covered by the tests. We also have been avoiding to remove pre-UAL support just because "bacon", but if it impacts a needed change, or if removing it fixes a bug, we tend to trim it off.<u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"> <u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
2. Increment the complexity of the assembler and disassembler in areas that you cannot predict right now.<u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
<span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Yes, I was wondering about this part. I’m not familiar with whether the assembler can easily create constant pools which is something that would definitely be needed. From my first glance it looks like creating and placing the constant pool is the tricky part in actually implementing this feature.</span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div></div></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
This is where things get interesting. IIRC, the ARM tools rely on the user to locate the constant pools (there’s a .constpool directive or something like that which spurs out whatever constants have been collected up to that point. It’s up to the user to make sure that the pool is in range for any load instructions referencing it. I assume a diagnostic is expected if they’re not, which is the part that would be tricky here. Not undoable, just tricky to thread the information through from where it starts to where it’ll be diagnosable (post-layout and relaxation in the object writer, probably).<u></u><u></u></div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
<span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">I see. Yes the ARM documents say it is the user’s responsibility to ensure the constant can be placed in a constant pool that is reachable by the instruction. LTORG is the arm directive that forces the assembler to emit the current constant pool. The corresponding gcc directive is .ltorg. Both armasm and gcc give an error if the constant pool is placed too far away.</span></div>
</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Sounds good. I’m not hugely fond of the assembler doing that sort of thing, but it’s not too horrible. The implementation to get a good diagnostic is where it’ll get “fun."</div>
<div class="im"><br><blockquote type="cite"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
<div><div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u><u></u></span></div></div>
<div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
Tangentially related, I would also very strongly oppose changing the compiler’s asm printer to use these constructs for its constant pool references. I don’t think that’s being proposed, but throwing it out there just in case that’s a direction anyone is considering.<u></u><u></u></div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
<span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">No, I’m not proposing to change the printer for constant pool references. I just want to support reading assembly with ldr pseudos.</span></div>
</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div>OK, cool. We’re on the same page, then.</div><div><div class="h5"><div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Agreed, I'd worry more about the "let's pick some instructions to figure out what the programmer meant!" rather than "eh, it's a shortcut".</div>
<div><br></div><div>-eric</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div class="h5"><div><blockquote type="cite">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
<div><div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u><u></u></span></div></div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><br><br><u></u><u></u></div><div><div style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-color:blue;border-left-width:1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4pt">
<div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></div></div><div>
<div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">It seems that this syntax allows for you to define symbols and constant pools, and both have interactions with the rest of the code generation, relocation symbols, etc. I can't guarantee right now that there will be no conflicts with anything elsewhere, and to make sure we're covering all bases, a huge amount of tests will need to be added. Of course, people are free to work on things that make their work compile and run, but you have to be aware that GNU-extensions and pre-UAL features are not taken lightly.<u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></div></div>
</div></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
If I understand the history correctly (very hazy, so I may not), this originated in ARM’s compiler, and GNU as adopted it from there.<u></u><u></u></div></div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
<br><br><u></u><u></u></div><div><div style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-color:blue;border-left-width:1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4pt"><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
<u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">Ultimately, if there is a feature that cannot be done any other way in ARM UAL, than we shall consider the options and implement the best. But if this is just syntactic sugar, than I'd strongly suggest you to upgrade your assembly files. The argument that "GCC does it" is used far too often in the LLVM list, and I can't say I'm a big fan of it. GCC did not take *only* smart decisions in its life (neither did LLVM), and copying everything from one side to the other blindly is not a good strategy.<u></u><u></u></div>
</div></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
In the general case, I vehemently agree with this. I am deeply concerned about the direction of some of the target assemblers in this regard.<u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">I’m a little more sympathetic to this specific case because it’s a feature of not just binutils, but the ARM tools also and last I checked, well documented. That said, great care and deliberation need to be taken.<u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
In summary, I’m very skeptical of the feature, but can see value. It’s on the line for me. I’m interested in hearing more of what y’all think about it.<u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">-Jim<u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div></div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><br><br><u></u><u></u></div><div><div style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-color:blue;border-left-width:1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4pt">
<div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"> <u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
I may be wrong, correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I got it, this looks just like syntactic sugar.<u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
<span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">I cannot think of why it would be more than syntactic sugar at this point. For me it is a new feature that I encountered when trying to compile some of our code bases here so it is possible that there could be something more that I’m missing. That said, I do think it is a useful sugar when you actually have to write assembly.</span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></div></div>
<div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">I think probably it is blindly convert each instance like this:</span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></div></div>
<div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> ldr r0, =foo</span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> @continuation point</span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">==></span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> ldr r0, [pc]</span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> b 2f</span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">1:</span><u></u><u></u></div></div>
<div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> .word foo</span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">2:</span><u></u><u></u></div></div>
<div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> @continuation point</span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div></div><div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
<span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">I think the first is much easier for the programmer to write and maintain. Btw, the local numeric label syntax (1:, b 1f) was new to me as well. Luckily for me the integrated assembler already supports this syntax :)</span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></div></div>
</div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">cheers,<u></u><u></u></div></div><div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif">
--renato<u></u><u></u></div></div></div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><span style="font-size:9pt;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif">_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br><a href="mailto:LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu</span></a><span> </span> <a href="http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu</span></a><br>
<a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank"><span style="color:purple">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev</span></a><u></u><u></u></span></div>
</div></div><div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"><u></u> <u></u></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu">LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu</a> <a href="http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu" target="_blank">http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>