<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Hal Finkel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hfinkel@anl.gov" target="_blank">hfinkel@anl.gov</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">----- Original Message -----<br>
><br>
> Food for thought: If you have a codebase which can't use<br>
> -fno-math-errno, because it relies on errno values from math<br>
> functions, it may be a more effective long-term strategy to work on<br>
> modernizing your codebase, eliminating the dependencies on errno,<br>
> rather than going through the trouble of adding even more complexity<br>
> to compilers to keep errno support limping along.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>Wouldn't that require 'modernizing' POSIX? ;) How else can you get the error code from open() or any number of other functions</blockquote><div><br></div><div>open is not a math function.</div><div><br>
</div><div>Dan</div><div><br></div></div></div></div>