<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">While looking at adding a new TargetOption, I saw that there is significant
overlap between the options listed in llvm/CodeGen/CommandFlags.h (which
are used to set TargetOptions in llc and opt) and the options in
LTOModule.cpp. There are only a few extra options in CommandFlags.h, and
all target options used by LTO are there. Would it make sense to use
CommandFlags.h in LTOModule as well?<div class="yj6qo ajU"><div aria-label="Show trimmed content" data-tooltip="Show trimmed content" id=":16x" class="ajR" role="button" tabindex="0"><img class="ajT" src="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif"></div><div aria-label="Show trimmed content" data-tooltip="Show trimmed content" id=":16x" class="ajR" role="button" tabindex="0"><br></div><div aria-label="Show trimmed content" data-tooltip="Show trimmed content" id=":16x" class="ajR" role="button" tabindex="0">- Stephen Crane</div></div></body></html>