<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br><div><div>On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Jeffrey Walton <<a href="mailto:noloader@gmail.com">noloader@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:59 PM, jahanian <<a href="mailto:fjahanian@apple.com">fjahanian@apple.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">Wouldn’t implementing this proposal be a red herring? By this I mean, it is<br>possible that<br>throughout the optimization phases, there is an implied assumption that all<br>functions<br>are similarly optimized. An example would be under certain optimization<br>flag, compiler changes<br>calling convention of static functions.<br></blockquote>Forgive my ignorance, but aren't all functions in the compilation unit<br>optimized at the same level? It does not matter if its a user supplied<br>command line or a makefile recipe.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div>Yes. This proposal wants to change this.</div><div>- Fariborz</div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><br>Jeff<br><br></div></blockquote></div><br></body></html>