<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Óscar Fuentes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ofv@wanadoo.es" target="_blank">ofv@wanadoo.es</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">"Daniels, Marcus G" <<a href="mailto:mdaniels@lanl.gov">mdaniels@lanl.gov</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
>> "Unfortunately, that does appear to be the case. I think MSVC 2010 is<br>
>> a reasonable requirement, but it seems like 2012 is the real target<br>
>> for C++11 features."<br>
<br>
</div>IMO, the only meaty C++11 feature that VS2012 adds over VS2010 is<br>
range-based for-loops.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The Nov '12 (maybe?) tech preview for new features is nice, but it's certainly not a usable baseline.<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><br>
> Bah, they can install Mingw binaries.<br>
<br>
</div>Sure! Actually, I wonder why people care about Visual Studio at all.<br>
<br>
Not.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu">LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu</a> <a href="http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu" target="_blank">http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><br><div>Thanks,</div><div><br></div><div>Justin Holewinski</div>
</div></div>