<div dir="ltr">On 8 January 2013 04:49, Duncan Sands <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:baldrick@free.fr" target="_blank">baldrick@free.fr</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
While this should be investigated,<br>
I'm tempted to just move everything over to LNT instead...<br></blockquote><div></div></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra" style>That's the latent bugs that David mentioned. I agree we should have LNT and LNT+LTO and possibly other configurations in the future.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra" style><br></div><div class="gmail_extra" style>Regarding your buildbots, gcc12 is easy to replace by LNT, because the default, AFAICT, is to run only clang tests (check-all I presume), but gcc20 is running the nightly tests, and I'm not sure I should change them to "simple" or keep as "nightly" but do it via LNT.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra" style><br></div><div class="gmail_extra" style>When I added Livermore, I presumed I was running LNT with the nightly variant (nt):</div><div class="gmail_extra" style><br></div><div class="gmail_extra" style>
<div class="gmail_extra">./sandbox/bin/python sandbox/bin/lnt runtest \</div><div class="gmail_extra">       --submit ~/devel/llvm/test/perfdb \</div><div class="gmail_extra">       nt \</div><div class="gmail_extra">       -j8 \</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">       --sandbox sandbox \</div><div class="gmail_extra">       --test-suite ~/devel/llvm/test/test-suite \</div><div class="gmail_extra">       --cc ~/devel/llvm/build/bin/clang \</div><div class="gmail_extra">
       --cxx ~/devel/llvm/build/bin/clang++ \</div><div class="gmail_extra">       --only-test SingleSource/Benchmarks/LivermoreLoops</div><div><br></div><div style>Is that right?</div><div style><br></div><div style>cheers,</div>
<div style>--renato</div></div></div>